Large increases in resistance training volume do not impair muscle hypertrophy or anabolic-catabolic molecular signaling in trained individuals
Skeletal muscle hypertrophy results from the integrated regulation of anabolic and proteolytic processes in response to mechanical loading. Although increases in resistance training (RT) volume are used to increase mechanical stress, it remains uncertain whether large and abrupt volume progressions could exceed muscle adaptive capacity by disrupting the balance between anabolic and catabolic signaling. The present study investigated whether a large increase in weekly RT volume (+120%) leads to impaired hypertrophic outcomes and intracellular regulatory responses compared with a modest increase (+20%). Twenty-five resistance-trained men and women (18-35 years old) completed an 8-week randomized, single-blind, within-subject unilateral intervention. Each participant trained both legs twice weekly, with one leg assigned to the large (VOL120) and the contralateral leg to the modest (VOL20) weekly volume progressions relative to habitual training volume. Vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) was assessed by ultrasonography before and after training. Muscle biopsies were obtained at baseline, post-intervention, and 24 h after the last session to quantify muscle fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA), satellite cell myonuclear content, and anabolic/catabolic signaling markers. Both protocols induced increases in mCSA over time (p<0.001), with no protocol vs. time interaction. No significant effects were observed for fCSA nor satellite cell number or myonuclear content. Additionally, molecular responses related to translational regulation and protein degradation were largely similar between protocols. A large abrupt increase in weekly resistance training volume (+120%) did not attenuate muscle hypertrophy relative to a modest increase (+20%) in resistance-trained individuals, and most acute and chronic molecular markers assessed likewise did not differ significantly between protocols.
Authors
- Cleiton Augusto Libardi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9003-7610)
- João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8797-9762)
- Dakota Tiede
- Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-2693)
- Diego Bittencourt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9953-5872)
- Michael D. Roberts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-5362)
- Alexander C. Berry (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6336-7798)
- Enya T. A. Nacafucasaco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6867-5269)
- Otavio Ferrari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2923-6182)
- Matheus Iasulaitis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7679-1476)
- Dustyn Lewis
- J. Max Michel
- Deivid G. da Silva
- Marcelo Rebelatto
- Ana C. C. Melo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9383-4558)
Institutions
- Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US)
- Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
- Auburn University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Published
- 2026-07-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00284.2026
- Primary Topic
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00