Large increases in resistance training volume do not impair muscle hypertrophy or anabolic-catabolic molecular signaling in trained individuals

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy results from the integrated regulation of anabolic and proteolytic processes in response to mechanical loading. Although increases in resistance training (RT) volume are used to increase mechanical stress, it remains uncertain whether large and abrupt volume progressions could exceed muscle adaptive capacity by disrupting the balance between anabolic and catabolic signaling. The present study investigated whether a large increase in weekly RT volume (+120%) leads to impaired hypertrophic outcomes and intracellular regulatory responses compared with a modest increase (+20%). Twenty-five resistance-trained men and women (18-35 years old) completed an 8-week randomized, single-blind, within-subject unilateral intervention. Each participant trained both legs twice weekly, with one leg assigned to the large (VOL120) and the contralateral leg to the modest (VOL20) weekly volume progressions relative to habitual training volume. Vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) was assessed by ultrasonography before and after training. Muscle biopsies were obtained at baseline, post-intervention, and 24 h after the last session to quantify muscle fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA), satellite cell myonuclear content, and anabolic/catabolic signaling markers. Both protocols induced increases in mCSA over time (p<0.001), with no protocol vs. time interaction. No significant effects were observed for fCSA nor satellite cell number or myonuclear content. Additionally, molecular responses related to translational regulation and protein degradation were largely similar between protocols. A large abrupt increase in weekly resistance training volume (+120%) did not attenuate muscle hypertrophy relative to a modest increase (+20%) in resistance-trained individuals, and most acute and chronic molecular markers assessed likewise did not differ significantly between protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00284.2026
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large increases in resistance training volume do not impair muscle hypertrophy or anabolic-catabolic molecular signaling in trained individuals

Cleiton Augusto Libardi, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Dakota Tiede, Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo et al.
Journal of Applied Physiology
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Large increases in resistance training volume do not impair muscle hypertrophy or anabolic-catabolic molecular signaling in trained individuals

Cleiton Augusto Libardi, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Dakota Tiede, Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo, Diego Bittencourt, Michael D. Roberts, Alexander C. Berry, Enya T. A. Nacafucasaco, Otavio Ferrari, Matheus Iasulaitis, Dustyn Lewis, J. Max Michel, Deivid G. da Silva, Marcelo Rebelatto, Ana C. C. Melo
article en

Abstract

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy results from the integrated regulation of anabolic and proteolytic processes in response to mechanical loading. Although increases in resistance training (RT) volume are used to increase mechanical stress, it remains uncertain whether large and abrupt volume progressions could exceed muscle adaptive capacity by disrupting the balance between anabolic and catabolic signaling. The present study investigated whether a large increase in weekly RT volume (+120%) leads to impaired hypertrophic outcomes and intracellular regulatory responses compared with a modest increase (+20%). Twenty-five resistance-trained men and women (18-35 years old) completed an 8-week randomized, single-blind, within-subject unilateral intervention. Each participant trained both legs twice weekly, with one leg assigned to the large (VOL120) and the contralateral leg to the modest (VOL20) weekly volume progressions relative to habitual training volume. Vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) was assessed by ultrasonography before and after training. Muscle biopsies were obtained at baseline, post-intervention, and 24 h after the last session to quantify muscle fiber cross-sectional area (fCSA), satellite cell myonuclear content, and anabolic/catabolic signaling markers. Both protocols induced increases in mCSA over time (p<0.001), with no protocol vs. time interaction. No significant effects were observed for fCSA nor satellite cell number or myonuclear content. Additionally, molecular responses related to translational regulation and protein degradation were largely similar between protocols. A large abrupt increase in weekly resistance training volume (+120%) did not attenuate muscle hypertrophy relative to a modest increase (+20%) in resistance-trained individuals, and most acute and chronic molecular markers assessed likewise did not differ significantly between protocols.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US), Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Auburn University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.