Characterizing Energy-Saving Levels in Green Remodeling Projects for Public Buildings: A Case-Based Analysis of Energy Composition and Retrofit Measures

Green remodeling projects for public buildings in South Korea aim to improve the energy performance of aging facilities, with a policy target of achieving at least 30% energy savings. Because the 30% saving rate functions as a key policy benchmark, it is necessary to identify why some projects achieve higher savings while others remain below the target. This requires a comparative analysis of energy-saving levels in relation to baseline energy-use composition and retrofit measure applications. This study analyzes the 1954 preliminary investigation and ECO2-OD-based assessment cases of public building green remodeling projects to examine energy-saving levels, baseline energy-use composition, end-use contributions, and retrofit measure applications. Pre- and post-retrofit primary energy demand for heating, cooling, domestic hot water, and lighting were used to calculate energy-saving rates. Based on the 30% policy target, the cases were classified into Low-saving, Target-achieving, High-saving, and Very-high-saving levels. The average energy-saving rate was 36.02%, but 39.61% of cases remained below the 30% target. Higher-saving groups showed greater baseline heating energy shares, increasing from 53.38% in the Low-saving group to 66.18% in the Very-high-saving group, suggesting an association between pre-retrofit energy-use structure and predicted retrofit potential under the ECO2-OD assessment framework. Heating was also the dominant contributor to total savings, with its contribution rising from 17.07 to 44.94 percentage points. Higher-saving cases tended to involve more comprehensive retrofit packages combining envelope, system, and lighting improvements. These findings suggest that energy-saving targets and retrofit strategies should consider baseline end-use energy composition and establish differentiated saving targets according to building characteristics, rather than relying only on uniform policy targets and average project performance.