Quantum-Gravitational Decoherence as the Origin of Primordial Perturbations: A Cyclic Cosmology from Exposed Singularities

We present Version 6.0 of a cosmological framework in which primordial perturbations originate from quantum-gravitational decoherence at Planck-scale Kerr remnants. This version introduces a previously absent consistency check: two rigorously independent calculations of the Planck-scale initial condition for inflation are compared for the first time. The first, established in V5.0, derives the Euclidean instanton action B = 0.74^(+0.23)_(−0.09) purely from horizon geometry — the LQG area gap, the Kerr/Schwarzschild horizon area ratio, and the perturbative rotational correction δ_rot ≈ 0.15. The second, introduced here, applies the Euclidean Friedmann constraint at the bounce surface using only the independently fixed nucleation radius a_i ≈ 2.2 ℓ_P, yielding (1/2)φ̇²_i ≃ 0.620 M_P⁴ — a result parametrization-independent by construction, since the Starobinsky potential contributes ≤ 10^(−10) M_P⁴ in the relevant range. The two calculations, derived by entirely different routes and with no parameter tuned to force agreement, converge to within 16%. We argue that this convergence constitutes a non-trivial structural consistency check on the framework's overall architecture, while emphasizing that it is not claimed as an exact identity. A previously asserted Hamilton-Jacobi derivation of B = (1/2)φ̇²_i is explicitly retracted after source verification. Three open problems are documented in full. First, the residual 16% gap and the associated shear/rotation partition cannot be independently calculated without first establishing whether the Euclidean section of Kerr with a/M = √3/2 constitutes an admissible Riemannian geometry under Witten's (2021) criterion — a question of independent interest that remains unresolved in the literature. Second, contrary to a previous internal claim, numerical integration reveals that the framework does not produce N_eff ≈ 60 e-folds of slow-roll inflation regardless of the initial field value φ_i; only φ_i ≳ 15 M_P succeeds, while smaller values overshoot the Starobinsky plateau and abort inflation within a few e-folds. This φ_i is not currently fixed by any element of the Kerr/LQG nucleation geometry. Third, the resulting kination phase N_kin ≈ 3.73–3.76 e-folds is logarithmically insensitive to the 16% discrepancy. The framework's central falsifiable predictions — r ≈ 0.0033, n_s ≈ 0.9678 — depend only on N_eff, not on B or N_kin, and remain unchanged whenever N_eff ≈ 60 is realized. LiteBIRD (2028+) measurement of r > 0.0083 or r < 0.0013 at 5σ excludes the model without parameter adjustment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21399189
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Quantum-Gravitational Decoherence as the Origin of Primordial Perturbations: A Cyclic Cosmology from Exposed Singularities

Carlos Javier Díaz Curiel
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
preprint

Quantum-Gravitational Decoherence as the Origin of Primordial Perturbations: A Cyclic Cosmology from Exposed Singularities

Carlos Javier Díaz Curiel
preprint en

Abstract

We present Version 6.0 of a cosmological framework in which primordial perturbations originate from quantum-gravitational decoherence at Planck-scale Kerr remnants. This version introduces a previously absent consistency check: two rigorously independent calculations of the Planck-scale initial condition for inflation are compared for the first time. The first, established in V5.0, derives the Euclidean instanton action B = 0.74^(+0.23)_(−0.09) purely from horizon geometry — the LQG area gap, the Kerr/Schwarzschild horizon area ratio, and the perturbative rotational correction δ_rot ≈ 0.15. The second, introduced here, applies the Euclidean Friedmann constraint at the bounce surface using only the independently fixed nucleation radius a_i ≈ 2.2 ℓ_P, yielding (1/2)φ̇²_i ≃ 0.620 M_P⁴ — a result parametrization-independent by construction, since the Starobinsky potential contributes ≤ 10^(−10) M_P⁴ in the relevant range. The two calculations, derived by entirely different routes and with no parameter tuned to force agreement, converge to within 16%. We argue that this convergence constitutes a non-trivial structural consistency check on the framework's overall architecture, while emphasizing that it is not claimed as an exact identity. A previously asserted Hamilton-Jacobi derivation of B = (1/2)φ̇²_i is explicitly retracted after source verification. Three open problems are documented in full. First, the residual 16% gap and the associated shear/rotation partition cannot be independently calculated without first establishing whether the Euclidean section of Kerr with a/M = √3/2 constitutes an admissible Riemannian geometry under Witten's (2021) criterion — a question of independent interest that remains unresolved in the literature. Second, contrary to a previous internal claim, numerical integration reveals that the framework does not produce N_eff ≈ 60 e-folds of slow-roll inflation regardless of the initial field value φ_i; only φ_i ≳ 15 M_P succeeds, while smaller values overshoot the Starobinsky plateau and abort inflation within a few e-folds. This φ_i is not currently fixed by any element of the Kerr/LQG nucleation geometry. Third, the resulting kination phase N_kin ≈ 3.73–3.76 e-folds is logarithmically insensitive to the 16% discrepancy. The framework's central falsifiable predictions — r ≈ 0.0033, n_s ≈ 0.9678 — depend only on N_eff, not on B or N_kin, and remain unchanged whenever N_eff ≈ 60 is realized. LiteBIRD (2028+) measurement of r > 0.0083 or r < 0.0013 at 5σ excludes the model without parameter adjustment.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.