Cardiovascular and Multisystem Outcomes Identified at Short- and Long-Term Follow-Up After COVID-19 Hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Persistent cardiovascular and multisystem manifestations remain an important concern following hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the spectrum of newly identified conditions during follow-up and their relationship with acute disease severity remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to describe cardiovascular and multisystem diagnoses, identified during short-term and long-term follow-up and to evaluate the association between acute-phase clinical characteristics, biomarkers, and subsequent outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study including 762 adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection between January 2021 and December 2022. Follow-up data were obtained from patients who re-presented to the same hospital during short-term follow-up (mean 4.33 months; n = 130) or long-term follow-up (mean 2.06 years; n = 186). Newly documented cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diagnoses recorded during routine clinical care were analyzed separately for each follow-up cohort. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Results: At least one newly documented diagnosis was identified in 120/130 patients (92.3%) during short-term follow-up and in 175/186 patients (94.1%) during long-term follow-up. Cardiovascular diagnoses were identified in 32.3% and 45.2% of patients attending short-term and long-term follow-up, respectively. Hypertension and atherosclerosis were the most frequent cardiovascular diagnoses during short-term follow-up, whereas heart failure and ischemic heart disease predominated among patients attending long-term follow-up. Pulmonary fibrosis was the most common non-cardiovascular diagnosis at both follow-up periods. Elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen levels during acute COVID-19 were independently associated with in-hospital mortality, whereas acute-phase NT-proBNP was not independently associated with cardiovascular diagnoses identified during follow-up. Conclusions: Patients who re-presented for clinical evaluation after hospitalization for COVID-19 exhibited a substantial burden of newly documented cardiovascular and multisystem diagnoses. Given the retrospective design, independent follow-up cohorts, and absence of a non-COVID control group, these findings should be interpreted as observational post-hospitalization data rather than evidence of causal or progressive post-COVID-19 disease. Prospective controlled longitudinal studies are needed to better define the long-term health consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
COVID
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/covid6070124
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiovascular and Multisystem Outcomes Identified at Short- and Long-Term Follow-Up After COVID-19 Hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Raluca Niculescu, Diana Maria Chiorean, Andreea Cătălina Tinca, Andreea Raluca Cozac-Szőke et al.
COVID
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Cardiovascular and Multisystem Outcomes Identified at Short- and Long-Term Follow-Up After COVID-19 Hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Raluca Niculescu, Diana Maria Chiorean, Andreea Cătălina Tinca, Andreea Raluca Cozac-Szőke, Iuliu Gabriel Cocuz, Claudia Raluca Mariean, Ovidiu Simion Cotoi, Anca Ileana Sin, Adrian Horațiu Sabău, Sofia Teodora Muntean, Nadja Emily Pop
article en

Abstract

Background: Persistent cardiovascular and multisystem manifestations remain an important concern following hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the spectrum of newly identified conditions during follow-up and their relationship with acute disease severity remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to describe cardiovascular and multisystem diagnoses, identified during short-term and long-term follow-up and to evaluate the association between acute-phase clinical characteristics, biomarkers, and subsequent outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study including 762 adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection between January 2021 and December 2022. Follow-up data were obtained from patients who re-presented to the same hospital during short-term follow-up (mean 4.33 months; n = 130) or long-term follow-up (mean 2.06 years; n = 186). Newly documented cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diagnoses recorded during routine clinical care were analyzed separately for each follow-up cohort. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Results: At least one newly documented diagnosis was identified in 120/130 patients (92.3%) during short-term follow-up and in 175/186 patients (94.1%) during long-term follow-up. Cardiovascular diagnoses were identified in 32.3% and 45.2% of patients attending short-term and long-term follow-up, respectively. Hypertension and atherosclerosis were the most frequent cardiovascular diagnoses during short-term follow-up, whereas heart failure and ischemic heart disease predominated among patients attending long-term follow-up. Pulmonary fibrosis was the most common non-cardiovascular diagnosis at both follow-up periods. Elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen levels during acute COVID-19 were independently associated with in-hospital mortality, whereas acute-phase NT-proBNP was not independently associated with cardiovascular diagnoses identified during follow-up. Conclusions: Patients who re-presented for clinical evaluation after hospitalization for COVID-19 exhibited a substantial burden of newly documented cardiovascular and multisystem diagnoses. Given the retrospective design, independent follow-up cohorts, and absence of a non-COVID control group, these findings should be interpreted as observational post-hospitalization data rather than evidence of causal or progressive post-COVID-19 disease. Prospective controlled longitudinal studies are needed to better define the long-term health consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

COVIDVol. 6(7)
Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș (RO), Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Târgu Mureş (RO), Spitalul Clinic Judetean Mures (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.