Environmental Journalism under Constraint: Literacy, Normative Pressures, and Institutional Gaps in Bangladesh

Environmental journalism in climate-vulnerable settings requires scientific literacy, policy expertise, and a deep engagement with local communities. Centering Bangladesh, this study examines how journalists navigate information gaps, institutional limits, and sociopolitical pressures in covering environmental issues. Drawing on qualitative insights from professional practice and interviews, the analysis investigates the routine pull of event-led coverage. It explores the newsroom capacity, training ecologies, and political frictions that influence story selection and depth. Rather than advancing a single diagnosis, this paper surfaces tensions that structure everyday reporting and identifies consequential junctures where local knowledge, accountability practices, and media routines intersect. By clarifying these dynamics, the study guides editors, funders, and regulators seeking evidence-informed ways to strengthen environmental reporting, safeguard press autonomy, and improve the translation of complex science into actionable public understanding, an agenda essential for societies on the frontlines of environmental disruption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism Practice
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2026.2703611
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Journalism under Constraint: Literacy, Normative Pressures, and Institutional Gaps in Bangladesh

Anirudha Biswas, Md. Shariful Islam, Md. Akil Khan
Journalism Practice
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Environmental Journalism under Constraint: Literacy, Normative Pressures, and Institutional Gaps in Bangladesh

Anirudha Biswas, Md. Shariful Islam, Md. Akil Khan
article en

Abstract

Environmental journalism in climate-vulnerable settings requires scientific literacy, policy expertise, and a deep engagement with local communities. Centering Bangladesh, this study examines how journalists navigate information gaps, institutional limits, and sociopolitical pressures in covering environmental issues. Drawing on qualitative insights from professional practice and interviews, the analysis investigates the routine pull of event-led coverage. It explores the newsroom capacity, training ecologies, and political frictions that influence story selection and depth. Rather than advancing a single diagnosis, this paper surfaces tensions that structure everyday reporting and identifies consequential junctures where local knowledge, accountability practices, and media routines intersect. By clarifying these dynamics, the study guides editors, funders, and regulators seeking evidence-informed ways to strengthen environmental reporting, safeguard press autonomy, and improve the translation of complex science into actionable public understanding, an agenda essential for societies on the frontlines of environmental disruption.

Journalism Practice
Khulna University (BD), University of Florida (US), MIT University (MK), Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US), RMIT University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.