A Rigorous, Collaborative Approach to Phenomenological Inquiry: Uncovering Embodied Sexual Experiences and Giving Voice to the Marginalized

In this paper, we present our rigorous, collaborative approach to attaining credibility, confirmability and dependability in phenomenological research. Within sexology, most studies are based in experimental methods. These are good for hypothesis testing but not as useful for discovery-oriented research. Our phenomenological approach is unusual in that we use a large team of researchers with diverse identities and backgrounds to uncover, discover and attempt to bracket (i.e., suspend) pre-conceived notions collaboratively. Six or more team members, trained in this methodology, review transcripts individually and subsequently, together, until themes emerge. After all but two transcripts have been reviewed, two additional, senior team members, sequestered from the process thus far, then provide fresh perspectives and "external" review of the data analysis, leading to further refinement. We have instituted additional safeguards to build consensus while limiting social influence. This labor-intensive approach gives us confidence that we capture key informants' experiences fully, faithfully and accurately, while remaining as close as possible to "the thing itself". Our approach maintains the integrity and epistemology consistent with viewing key informants as the subjects of (rather than objects of) their own experience. This method can be especially useful for studying complex, nuanced, sexual phenomena, notably with marginalized populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2026.2702761
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Rigorous, Collaborative Approach to Phenomenological Inquiry: Uncovering Embodied Sexual Experiences and Giving Voice to the Marginalized

Maxime Charest, Peggy J. Kleinplatz, Emily Rice
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

A Rigorous, Collaborative Approach to Phenomenological Inquiry: Uncovering Embodied Sexual Experiences and Giving Voice to the Marginalized

Maxime Charest, Peggy J. Kleinplatz, Emily Rice
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we present our rigorous, collaborative approach to attaining credibility, confirmability and dependability in phenomenological research. Within sexology, most studies are based in experimental methods. These are good for hypothesis testing but not as useful for discovery-oriented research. Our phenomenological approach is unusual in that we use a large team of researchers with diverse identities and backgrounds to uncover, discover and attempt to bracket (i.e., suspend) pre-conceived notions collaboratively. Six or more team members, trained in this methodology, review transcripts individually and subsequently, together, until themes emerge. After all but two transcripts have been reviewed, two additional, senior team members, sequestered from the process thus far, then provide fresh perspectives and "external" review of the data analysis, leading to further refinement. We have instituted additional safeguards to build consensus while limiting social influence. This labor-intensive approach gives us confidence that we capture key informants' experiences fully, faithfully and accurately, while remaining as close as possible to "the thing itself". Our approach maintains the integrity and epistemology consistent with viewing key informants as the subjects of (rather than objects of) their own experience. This method can be especially useful for studying complex, nuanced, sexual phenomena, notably with marginalized populations.

Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
University of Ottawa (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.