What Should We Understand by “Innovation” in the Critical Narration against Deepfakes, Synthetic Media, and Disinformation Campaigns? Rethinking Existing Social Research on Digital Technology

This paper critically reviews literature on technological, socio-technical, policy and community‑based innovations intended to prevent, detect, mitigate, and respond to deepfakes, synthetic media, and disinformation campaigns. Grounded in an interdisciplinary framework that integrates information‑disorder theory (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2017), digital colonialism critiques (Couldry & Mejias, 2019; Kwet, 2019), and propaganda models (Herman & Chomsky, 1988), the review synthesizes empirical and theoretical work across media forensics, machine learning detection, platform governance, media literacy, legal remedies, and grassroots approaches. Using a systematic literature-review methodology (PRISMA guidelines), sources from technical computer-vision research, social science studies of computational propaganda, policy reports, and African/Cameroonian analyses were included. Fifteen principal findings are presented and developed, each followed by a focused discussion addressing conceptual clarity about what counts as “innovation,” trade-offs, context sensitivity (with emphasis on Cameroon and sub-Saharan Africa), and feasibility. The review concludes that “innovation” should not be limited to algorithmic novelty but must include socio‑technical innovations: context-aware detection, platform transparency, community-centered verification, legal safeguards, and investment in local digital sovereignty. The paper ends with a prioritized research and policy agenda and 25 curated references. Confidence in the review’s synthesis is moderate–high for broad patterns and more cautious for fast-moving technical claims (detection arms race), consistent with epistemic humility in emergent fields. Keywords: innovation; Deepfakes; Cameroon; media forensics; disinformation; information disorder; digital sovereignty; platform governance; synthetic media; detection

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64823/ijssr.2601002
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Should We Understand by “Innovation” in the Critical Narration against Deepfakes, Synthetic Media, and Disinformation Campaigns? Rethinking Existing Social Research on Digital Technology

Prof. Alfred Ndi, Silas Manda
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

What Should We Understand by “Innovation” in the Critical Narration against Deepfakes, Synthetic Media, and Disinformation Campaigns? Rethinking Existing Social Research on Digital Technology

Prof. Alfred Ndi, Silas Manda
article en

Abstract

This paper critically reviews literature on technological, socio-technical, policy and community‑based innovations intended to prevent, detect, mitigate, and respond to deepfakes, synthetic media, and disinformation campaigns. Grounded in an interdisciplinary framework that integrates information‑disorder theory (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2017), digital colonialism critiques (Couldry & Mejias, 2019; Kwet, 2019), and propaganda models (Herman & Chomsky, 1988), the review synthesizes empirical and theoretical work across media forensics, machine learning detection, platform governance, media literacy, legal remedies, and grassroots approaches. Using a systematic literature-review methodology (PRISMA guidelines), sources from technical computer-vision research, social science studies of computational propaganda, policy reports, and African/Cameroonian analyses were included. Fifteen principal findings are presented and developed, each followed by a focused discussion addressing conceptual clarity about what counts as “innovation,” trade-offs, context sensitivity (with emphasis on Cameroon and sub-Saharan Africa), and feasibility. The review concludes that “innovation” should not be limited to algorithmic novelty but must include socio‑technical innovations: context-aware detection, platform transparency, community-centered verification, legal safeguards, and investment in local digital sovereignty. The paper ends with a prioritized research and policy agenda and 25 curated references. Confidence in the review’s synthesis is moderate–high for broad patterns and more cautious for fast-moving technical claims (detection arms race), consistent with epistemic humility in emergent fields. Keywords: innovation; Deepfakes; Cameroon; media forensics; disinformation; information disorder; digital sovereignty; platform governance; synthetic media; detection

University of Bamenda (CM)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.