Guide-Extension Catheter-Assisted Bail-Out Thrombus Aspiration During PCI for Thrombus-Rich Acute Coronary Syndromes: Contemporary Review and Clinical Case Examples

Large intracoronary thrombus burden during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains technically challenging when conventional manual aspiration is ineffective or dedicated thrombectomy systems are unavailable, unsuitable, or undeliverable. Routine aspiration thrombectomy is not guideline-supported, but selective bail-out thrombus-removal strategies remain relevant in refractory thrombus-rich PCI. This contemporary narrative review, supplemented by six retrospective single-center clinical examples, describes off-label guide-extension catheter (GEC)-assisted thrombus aspiration and places it within the current thrombectomy landscape, including manual aspiration catheters, sustained mechanical aspiration platforms, and stent-retriever-based systems. The heterogeneous examples, predominantly involving the right coronary artery, are educational and hypothesis-generating only: they illustrate procedural mechanics, patient selection, technical pitfalls, and risk mitigation, but do not provide efficacy or safety evidence. GEC-assisted aspiration may be considered when bulky proximal thrombus cannot be captured by smaller catheters or when a GEC can be positioned coaxially near the thrombus face under uninterrupted negative pressure. The technique remains operator-dependent, off-label, and anatomically constrained and should be regarded as a contingency maneuver rather than an alternative to purpose-built systems with more formal device-specific evaluation. Prospective registries and comparative studies are required before efficacy, safety, or relative value can be established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15145582
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guide-Extension Catheter-Assisted Bail-Out Thrombus Aspiration During PCI for Thrombus-Rich Acute Coronary Syndromes: Contemporary Review and Clinical Case Examples

Mihajlo Kovačić, Andrija Matetić, Mislav Lozo, Jakša Zanchi et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Guide-Extension Catheter-Assisted Bail-Out Thrombus Aspiration During PCI for Thrombus-Rich Acute Coronary Syndromes: Contemporary Review and Clinical Case Examples

Mihajlo Kovačić, Andrija Matetić, Mislav Lozo, Jakša Zanchi, Josip A. Borovac, Mladen I. Vidovich, Anteo Bradarić, Nikola Crnčević, D Mirić, Claudiu Ungureanu, George Dangas
article en

Abstract

Large intracoronary thrombus burden during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains technically challenging when conventional manual aspiration is ineffective or dedicated thrombectomy systems are unavailable, unsuitable, or undeliverable. Routine aspiration thrombectomy is not guideline-supported, but selective bail-out thrombus-removal strategies remain relevant in refractory thrombus-rich PCI. This contemporary narrative review, supplemented by six retrospective single-center clinical examples, describes off-label guide-extension catheter (GEC)-assisted thrombus aspiration and places it within the current thrombectomy landscape, including manual aspiration catheters, sustained mechanical aspiration platforms, and stent-retriever-based systems. The heterogeneous examples, predominantly involving the right coronary artery, are educational and hypothesis-generating only: they illustrate procedural mechanics, patient selection, technical pitfalls, and risk mitigation, but do not provide efficacy or safety evidence. GEC-assisted aspiration may be considered when bulky proximal thrombus cannot be captured by smaller catheters or when a GEC can be positioned coaxially near the thrombus face under uninterrupted negative pressure. The technique remains operator-dependent, off-label, and anatomically constrained and should be regarded as a contingency maneuver rather than an alternative to purpose-built systems with more formal device-specific evaluation. Prospective registries and comparative studies are required before efficacy, safety, or relative value can be established.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(14)
University of Illinois Chicago (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Hôpital de Jolimont (BE), Polytechnic of Međimurje in Čakovec (HR), University of Split (HR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.