The whole is not the sum of its parts: demand for defense spending in the EU and NATO

What drives demand for defense spending and, especially, different types of defense spending? While a large body of literature addresses the determinants of countries’ defense spending, only recently have scholars begun analyzing the determinants of disaggregated defense budgets, focusing on equipment, personnel, infrastructure, and operating and maintenance (O&M). Using a purpose-built unbalanced panel dataset covering 35 NATO and EU countries over 10–30 years (1993–2023), we find significant heterogeneity in the drivers of defense expenditure across countries, over time, and among spending categories. Domestic political economy factors, including GDP growth and unemployment, emerge as more consistent drivers of spending components than traditional strategic threat variables or alliance dynamics. These findings refine existing models of defense demand by showing that domestic political economy variables are more consistently associated with disaggregated defense spending components than strategic variables. This pattern is robust across alternative specifications using both expenditure shares and real USD spending levels. The results have important policy implications as European countries recapitalize their militaries and replenish munitions depleted by the Russo-Ukrainian war, highlighting the domestic political economy constraints on defense investment.Footnote1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Defence and Peace Economics
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2026.2697831
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The whole is not the sum of its parts: demand for defense spending in the EU and NATO

Jordan Malesky Becker, J. Paul Dunne
Defence and Peace Economics
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

The whole is not the sum of its parts: demand for defense spending in the EU and NATO

Jordan Malesky Becker, J. Paul Dunne
article en

Abstract

What drives demand for defense spending and, especially, different types of defense spending? While a large body of literature addresses the determinants of countries’ defense spending, only recently have scholars begun analyzing the determinants of disaggregated defense budgets, focusing on equipment, personnel, infrastructure, and operating and maintenance (O&M). Using a purpose-built unbalanced panel dataset covering 35 NATO and EU countries over 10–30 years (1993–2023), we find significant heterogeneity in the drivers of defense expenditure across countries, over time, and among spending categories. Domestic political economy factors, including GDP growth and unemployment, emerge as more consistent drivers of spending components than traditional strategic threat variables or alliance dynamics. These findings refine existing models of defense demand by showing that domestic political economy variables are more consistently associated with disaggregated defense spending components than strategic variables. This pattern is robust across alternative specifications using both expenditure shares and real USD spending levels. The results have important policy implications as European countries recapitalize their militaries and replenish munitions depleted by the Russo-Ukrainian war, highlighting the domestic political economy constraints on defense investment.Footnote1

Defence and Peace Economics
University of Cape Town (ZA), United States Military Academy (US), American Military Academy (PR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.