No Exempt Node: A Typed Theory of Recursive Auditability

An assurance system whose own operation is not auditable is indistinguishable from absent assurance — the falsifiability thesis turned upon the assurance system itself. We propose a typed theory of assurance systems organised around one idea: every observation has a typed birth, a complete genealogy, and an audit mode determined by that birth. The axiom is structural (no exempt node); the type system concerns knowledge transformations by admissible input domain (connection, derivation, assurance), with no fourth. Three theorems follow (closure of transformations; complete genealogy; completeness of influence representation), a taxonomy of assurance failures as type violations (of which automated assurance is canonical), and a change of status for contradiction (an observable, not a judgement). Independence from the audited party is a corollary, not the subject; we separate the structural independence of the graph from the source independence of each observation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21402662
Primary Topic
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

No Exempt Node: A Typed Theory of Recursive Auditability

PATRICK JUVET ETOUA
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
preprint

No Exempt Node: A Typed Theory of Recursive Auditability

PATRICK JUVET ETOUA
preprint en

Abstract

An assurance system whose own operation is not auditable is indistinguishable from absent assurance — the falsifiability thesis turned upon the assurance system itself. We propose a typed theory of assurance systems organised around one idea: every observation has a typed birth, a complete genealogy, and an audit mode determined by that birth. The axiom is structural (no exempt node); the type system concerns knowledge transformations by admissible input domain (connection, derivation, assurance), with no fourth. Three theorems follow (closure of transformations; complete genealogy; completeness of influence representation), a taxonomy of assurance failures as type violations (of which automated assurance is canonical), and a change of status for contradiction (an observable, not a judgement). Independence from the audited party is a corollary, not the subject; we separate the structural independence of the graph from the source independence of each observation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
zyBooks (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.