Heup Young Kim's Trajectory towards <i>Theodao</i> and His Approach to the Trinity

From the outset, Heup Young Kim showed a strong interest in developing a Korean contextual theology grounded in Korean cultural identity. Kim completed his doctoral thesis on a comparative analysis of Karl Barth and Yang-ming Wang. Since then, Kim has focused on developing the foundations of theodao , a theology of dao from an East Asian perspective. This article examines Kim's theological trajectory towards theodao . Through his exploration of a Christian–Confucian/Daoist dialogue, Kim began by focusing on the question of humanity. He then developed the concept of Christodao , understanding Jesus Christ as “the dao of humanity” or “the dao of new cosmic humanity,” before elaborating Christodao into a distinct theological framework and, ultimately, theodao . However, this article also recognizes that there has been little reference to the Trinity. Explicit discussions of the Trinity first appear only in Kim’s works published in 2011 and 2013. Even in these trinitarian works, however, Kim was overwhelmingly focused on forming an East Asian Christological or theological framework/paradigm/model, rather than on directly exploring Jesus Christ and the triune God. Thus Kim’s proposal of theodao does not appear to establish a necessary or intrinsic connection between Christology and the doctrine of the Trinity. This discovery implies that Kim's trajectory towards theodao has been significantly influenced by his passionate interest in Korean contextual theology that is deeply thoroughly grounded in Jesus Christ, andshould establish a necessary or intrinsic connection between Christology and its understanding of the Trinity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theology Today
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00405736261467409
Primary Topic
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heup Young Kim's Trajectory towards Theodao and His Approach to the Trinity

Chung-Hyun Baik
Theology Today
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
article

Heup Young Kim's Trajectory towards Theodao and His Approach to the Trinity

Chung-Hyun Baik
article en

Abstract

From the outset, Heup Young Kim showed a strong interest in developing a Korean contextual theology grounded in Korean cultural identity. Kim completed his doctoral thesis on a comparative analysis of Karl Barth and Yang-ming Wang. Since then, Kim has focused on developing the foundations of theodao , a theology of dao from an East Asian perspective. This article examines Kim's theological trajectory towards theodao . Through his exploration of a Christian–Confucian/Daoist dialogue, Kim began by focusing on the question of humanity. He then developed the concept of Christodao , understanding Jesus Christ as “the dao of humanity” or “the dao of new cosmic humanity,” before elaborating Christodao into a distinct theological framework and, ultimately, theodao . However, this article also recognizes that there has been little reference to the Trinity. Explicit discussions of the Trinity first appear only in Kim’s works published in 2011 and 2013. Even in these trinitarian works, however, Kim was overwhelmingly focused on forming an East Asian Christological or theological framework/paradigm/model, rather than on directly exploring Jesus Christ and the triune God. Thus Kim’s proposal of theodao does not appear to establish a necessary or intrinsic connection between Christology and the doctrine of the Trinity. This discovery implies that Kim's trajectory towards theodao has been significantly influenced by his passionate interest in Korean contextual theology that is deeply thoroughly grounded in Jesus Christ, andshould establish a necessary or intrinsic connection between Christology and its understanding of the Trinity.

Theology Today
Presbyterian University and Theological Seminary (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.