Electrode Choices in Cochlear Incomplete Partition Type III: The Experience of a Romanian Tertiary Unit

Objectives: Incomplete partition type III is a rare malformation of the inner ear characterized by the absence of the modiolus, fixation of the stapes, and significant communication between the cochlea and the internal auditory canal (IAC). During cochlear implant (CI) surgery, there is a risk that the electrode array may enter the IAC, resulting in non-specific stimulation of auditory neurons or other nerve fibers inside the IAC. In this study, we present our experience with CI surgery in patients with incomplete partition type III and report the types of devices utilized. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all our patients with cochlear incomplete partition type III who underwent surgical cochlear implantation in a tertiary referral unit over the past 16 years. Results: Of the perimodiolar electrodes used initially, four were correctly positioned within the cochlea from initial insertion, and no reinsertion was necessary. A lateral wall electrode array CI was selected to replace the last failed perimodiolar insertion, but it also required two insertion attempts due to its initial misplacement into the internal auditory canal. Conclusions: In this study, electrode array selection was influenced by surgeon preference and by intraoperative factors such as the severity of the gusher. Our observations suggest that perimodiolar CIs can be used in selected cases of incomplete partition type III and did not appear to increase the risk of IAC misplacement compared with the lateral wall array used in one patient. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously as observations from the authors’ experience rather than as generalized conclusions regarding the relative safety of perimodiolar versus lateral wall electrode arrays. Lateral wall arrays may also be misplaced into the IAC, and their use may be considered in cases with severe and difficult-to-control gusher.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14071597
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrode Choices in Cochlear Incomplete Partition Type III: The Experience of a Romanian Tertiary Unit

Gabriela Mușat, Mihai Dumitru, Adina Zamfir‐Chiru‐Anton, Dan-Cristian Gheorghe
Biomedicines
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Electrode Choices in Cochlear Incomplete Partition Type III: The Experience of a Romanian Tertiary Unit

Gabriela Mușat, Mihai Dumitru, Adina Zamfir‐Chiru‐Anton, Dan-Cristian Gheorghe
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Incomplete partition type III is a rare malformation of the inner ear characterized by the absence of the modiolus, fixation of the stapes, and significant communication between the cochlea and the internal auditory canal (IAC). During cochlear implant (CI) surgery, there is a risk that the electrode array may enter the IAC, resulting in non-specific stimulation of auditory neurons or other nerve fibers inside the IAC. In this study, we present our experience with CI surgery in patients with incomplete partition type III and report the types of devices utilized. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all our patients with cochlear incomplete partition type III who underwent surgical cochlear implantation in a tertiary referral unit over the past 16 years. Results: Of the perimodiolar electrodes used initially, four were correctly positioned within the cochlea from initial insertion, and no reinsertion was necessary. A lateral wall electrode array CI was selected to replace the last failed perimodiolar insertion, but it also required two insertion attempts due to its initial misplacement into the internal auditory canal. Conclusions: In this study, electrode array selection was influenced by surgeon preference and by intraoperative factors such as the severity of the gusher. Our observations suggest that perimodiolar CIs can be used in selected cases of incomplete partition type III and did not appear to increase the risk of IAC misplacement compared with the lateral wall array used in one patient. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously as observations from the authors’ experience rather than as generalized conclusions regarding the relative safety of perimodiolar versus lateral wall electrode arrays. Lateral wall arrays may also be misplaced into the IAC, and their use may be considered in cases with severe and difficult-to-control gusher.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(7)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Spitalului Clinic de Urgență pentru Copii Maria Sklodowska Curie (RO), Emergency University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.