Machine learning prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a european multicentre analysis of survival and risk of second malignancy

INTRODUCTION: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is rare in Europe, and emerging data suggest poorer outcomes in Caucasian patients compared with Asian populations, highlighting the need for region-specific prognostic tools. Inflammation-based biomarkers and artificial intelligence show promise for risk stratification and prediction of survival and second primary cancers (SPCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study including 405 NPC patients from six European institutions. Demographic, clinicopathological, and haematologic inflammatory markers were collected, and machine learning algorithms were developed to predict 5-year OS and SPC occurrence. Multiple train-test splitting strategies and machine learning (ML) classifiers were evaluated. Models were tested both with and without systemic inflammatory ratios to assess their added prognostic value. RESULTS: The median age was 52 years, 91.6% of patients were classified as White/European ancestry, and 77.3% received chemoradiotherapy. Five-year OS was 66.6%, while 12.8% developed SPC. The Random Forest classifier achieved the best performance for OS prediction (accuracy 0.74; AUC 0.66) using the complete feature set, while SPC prediction reached an accuracy of 0.80 (AUC 0.74). Exclusion of inflammatory markers resulted in a consistent decline in accuracy across all models. Feature-importance analysis highlighted inflammatory ratios among the strongest predictors for both OS and SPC. The present study was reported according to TRIPOD+AI reporting guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first machine-learning prognostic models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma derived from a predominantly Caucasian European multicentre cohort. Systemic inflammatory markers modestly improved overall survival prediction and substantially enhanced second primary cancer risk estimation. The resulting models are transparent, cost-effective, and support the potential benefit of prognostic assessment through machine learning in non-endemic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10461-z
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a european multicentre analysis of survival and risk of second malignancy

Cesare Piazza, Camelia Chira, Pavol Šurda, Davide Tomasini et al.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Machine learning prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a european multicentre analysis of survival and risk of second malignancy

Cesare Piazza, Camelia Chira, Pavol Šurda, Davide Tomasini, Marco Stellin, Anda Gâta, Vlad Alexandru Gâta, Laura Diana Cernau, Vittorio Rampinelli, Daniele Borsetto, Paolo Boscolo‐Rizzo, Silviu Albu, Adél Bajcsi, I Puşcaş, Will Ince, Carlos M. Chiesa-Estomba, Alexandra Roman, Eleanor Crossley, Alexandru Irimie, Laura Silvia Diosan, Matt Lechner, Maria Landa-Garmendia, Teodora Maria Ursu
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is rare in Europe, and emerging data suggest poorer outcomes in Caucasian patients compared with Asian populations, highlighting the need for region-specific prognostic tools. Inflammation-based biomarkers and artificial intelligence show promise for risk stratification and prediction of survival and second primary cancers (SPCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study including 405 NPC patients from six European institutions. Demographic, clinicopathological, and haematologic inflammatory markers were collected, and machine learning algorithms were developed to predict 5-year OS and SPC occurrence. Multiple train-test splitting strategies and machine learning (ML) classifiers were evaluated. Models were tested both with and without systemic inflammatory ratios to assess their added prognostic value. RESULTS: The median age was 52 years, 91.6% of patients were classified as White/European ancestry, and 77.3% received chemoradiotherapy. Five-year OS was 66.6%, while 12.8% developed SPC. The Random Forest classifier achieved the best performance for OS prediction (accuracy 0.74; AUC 0.66) using the complete feature set, while SPC prediction reached an accuracy of 0.80 (AUC 0.74). Exclusion of inflammatory markers resulted in a consistent decline in accuracy across all models. Feature-importance analysis highlighted inflammatory ratios among the strongest predictors for both OS and SPC. The present study was reported according to TRIPOD+AI reporting guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first machine-learning prognostic models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma derived from a predominantly Caucasian European multicentre cohort. Systemic inflammatory markers modestly improved overall survival prediction and substantially enhanced second primary cancer risk estimation. The resulting models are transparent, cost-effective, and support the potential benefit of prognostic assessment through machine learning in non-endemic settings.

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
St Thomas' Hospital (GB), Universidad de Deusto (ES), University of Padua (IT), University of Trieste (IT), Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute (ES), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), University College London (GB), University of Brescia (IT)
Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Iuliu Haţieganu Cluj-Napoca
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.