Early Doctrines and Concepts of Indian Materialism Preserved in the Chinese Buddhist Canon

This article tries to show how early elements of the Chinese Buddhist Canon can expand our understanding of the concepts and tenets of ancient Indian materialism. To assist in this understanding, the doctrines of the five ancient, renowned heretical teachers as preserved in the Shamenguo Jing, the closest Chinese parallel of the Samaññaphala Sutta, are juxtaposed with the latter and philosophically analyzed. For the study of early concepts, the current works are first critically analyzed and substantiated by relevant materials surviving only in the Chinese Buddhist Canon. The four-fold categories of practitioners, Śramaṇas, Brāhmaṇas, Carakas, and Parivrājakas, appear in an Āgama sūtra as well as some early Mahāyāna sūtras preserved in Chinese, and this contrasts with the Śramaṇas-Brāhmaṇas classification found in the Pāli Canon as well as with other Indic sources. The presence of the term caraka—itinerant practitioner of medicine—in the older strata of the Chinese Buddhist Canon also merits scholarly attention, especially since this term is entirely absent from the Pāli Buddhist Canon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17070850
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Doctrines and Concepts of Indian Materialism Preserved in the Chinese Buddhist Canon

Daisung Han, 서왕모
Religions
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Early Doctrines and Concepts of Indian Materialism Preserved in the Chinese Buddhist Canon

Daisung Han, 서왕모
article en

Abstract

This article tries to show how early elements of the Chinese Buddhist Canon can expand our understanding of the concepts and tenets of ancient Indian materialism. To assist in this understanding, the doctrines of the five ancient, renowned heretical teachers as preserved in the Shamenguo Jing, the closest Chinese parallel of the Samaññaphala Sutta, are juxtaposed with the latter and philosophically analyzed. For the study of early concepts, the current works are first critically analyzed and substantiated by relevant materials surviving only in the Chinese Buddhist Canon. The four-fold categories of practitioners, Śramaṇas, Brāhmaṇas, Carakas, and Parivrājakas, appear in an Āgama sūtra as well as some early Mahāyāna sūtras preserved in Chinese, and this contrasts with the Śramaṇas-Brāhmaṇas classification found in the Pāli Canon as well as with other Indic sources. The presence of the term caraka—itinerant practitioner of medicine—in the older strata of the Chinese Buddhist Canon also merits scholarly attention, especially since this term is entirely absent from the Pāli Buddhist Canon.

ReligionsVol. 17(7)
Dongguk University (KR), Seoul University of Buddhism (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.