Implementation of tumour treating fields for glioblastoma in Belgium: real-world outcomes from a Belgian tertiary centre

Objectives Tumour treating fields (TTF) improve survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) in randomized trials, but real-world impact in Belgium remains unclear due to limited access and lack of reimbursement. This study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in Belgian patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with TTF alongside standard therapy.Methods We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study at UZ Leuven including patients with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed GBM treated with TTF between April 2019 and July 2026. TTF was initiated during adjuvant temozolomide. Clinical, molecular and treatment data were extracted from institutional records. Primary outcomes were PFS and OS from diagnosis. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed, including subgroup analyses by MGMT status, device adherence (>75%), and extent of resection.Results Twenty-eight patients were analysed (median age 52 years; 71% male). MGMT promoter methylation was present in 29% and gross total resection was achieved in 50%. Adherence exceeded 75% in 96%. Median PFS was 6.8 months and median OS 24.6 months, comparing favourably with EF-14 outcomes. ECOG status predicted survival (p = 0.04). Survival was not associated with MGMT status or adherence. Gross total resection showed a clinically meaningful association with improved OS (30.7 vs 8.2 months; p = 0.07). Treatment was well tolerated.Conclusion In this real-world Belgian cohort, TTF with standard therapy yielded survival outcomes consistent with or exceeding pivotal trials. While clinical benefit appears evident, implementation remains challenged by financial costs. Further prospective Belgian studies are needed to assess cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Clinica Belgica
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2026.2701965
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of tumour treating fields for glioblastoma in Belgium: real-world outcomes from a Belgian tertiary centre

Paul M. Clément, Lukas Marcelis, Sarah Cappelle, Joost Dejaegher et al.
Acta Clinica Belgica
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Implementation of tumour treating fields for glioblastoma in Belgium: real-world outcomes from a Belgian tertiary centre

Paul M. Clément, Lukas Marcelis, Sarah Cappelle, Joost Dejaegher, Philippe Demaerel, Annelies Feyaerts, S De Vleeschouwer, K Goffin, Maarten Lambrecht, Julie Lambert
article en

Abstract

Objectives Tumour treating fields (TTF) improve survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) in randomized trials, but real-world impact in Belgium remains unclear due to limited access and lack of reimbursement. This study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in Belgian patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with TTF alongside standard therapy.Methods We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study at UZ Leuven including patients with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed GBM treated with TTF between April 2019 and July 2026. TTF was initiated during adjuvant temozolomide. Clinical, molecular and treatment data were extracted from institutional records. Primary outcomes were PFS and OS from diagnosis. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed, including subgroup analyses by MGMT status, device adherence (>75%), and extent of resection.Results Twenty-eight patients were analysed (median age 52 years; 71% male). MGMT promoter methylation was present in 29% and gross total resection was achieved in 50%. Adherence exceeded 75% in 96%. Median PFS was 6.8 months and median OS 24.6 months, comparing favourably with EF-14 outcomes. ECOG status predicted survival (p = 0.04). Survival was not associated with MGMT status or adherence. Gross total resection showed a clinically meaningful association with improved OS (30.7 vs 8.2 months; p = 0.07). Treatment was well tolerated.Conclusion In this real-world Belgian cohort, TTF with standard therapy yielded survival outcomes consistent with or exceeding pivotal trials. While clinical benefit appears evident, implementation remains challenged by financial costs. Further prospective Belgian studies are needed to assess cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life impact.

Acta Clinica Belgica
KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.