Comparing feedback learning and arousal responses in Down, Fragile X, and Williams syndromes

Mechanisms underlying feedback learning in intellectual disability (ID) remain poorly understood. Down syndrome (DS), Fragile X syndrome (FXS), and Williams syndrome (WS) are genetic syndromes associated with ID, with distinct attention and arousal regulation profiles. Pupil dilation is a well-established index of feedback processing in typical development; little is known about these processes in non-social learning in these syndromes. Participants with DS (n = 13), FXS (n = 13), WS (n = 27), and typically developing (TD) individuals (n = 56) aged 6-60 years completed a reward contingency reversal task while eye-tracking recorded pupil dilation and gaze allocation. Data were analyzed using Bayesian mixed-effects models. All groups effectively learned from feedback, staying with rewarded options and switching after losses. WS participants performed similarly to TD participants. DS and FXS individuals showed more variable behavioral performance, indicating potential individual differences in feedback processing that warrant further investigation. Physiologically, TD individuals showed greater pupil dilation following losses than wins, whereas WS individuals showed no difference, suggesting attenuated physiological sensitivity to feedback valence. All groups tended to fixate on the previously rewarded options. This research highlights the value of combining behavioral and physiological approaches in ID research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00438-2
Primary Topic
Williams Syndrome Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing feedback learning and arousal responses in Down, Fragile X, and Williams syndromes

Charlotte Willfors, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Matilda A. Frick, Astrid E. Z. Hallman et al.
npj Science of Learning
Williams Syndrome Research
article

Comparing feedback learning and arousal responses in Down, Fragile X, and Williams syndromes

Charlotte Willfors, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Matilda A. Frick, Astrid E. Z. Hallman, Ann Nordgren
article en

Abstract

Mechanisms underlying feedback learning in intellectual disability (ID) remain poorly understood. Down syndrome (DS), Fragile X syndrome (FXS), and Williams syndrome (WS) are genetic syndromes associated with ID, with distinct attention and arousal regulation profiles. Pupil dilation is a well-established index of feedback processing in typical development; little is known about these processes in non-social learning in these syndromes. Participants with DS (n = 13), FXS (n = 13), WS (n = 27), and typically developing (TD) individuals (n = 56) aged 6-60 years completed a reward contingency reversal task while eye-tracking recorded pupil dilation and gaze allocation. Data were analyzed using Bayesian mixed-effects models. All groups effectively learned from feedback, staying with rewarded options and switching after losses. WS participants performed similarly to TD participants. DS and FXS individuals showed more variable behavioral performance, indicating potential individual differences in feedback processing that warrant further investigation. Physiologically, TD individuals showed greater pupil dilation following losses than wins, whereas WS individuals showed no difference, suggesting attenuated physiological sensitivity to feedback valence. All groups tended to fixate on the previously rewarded options. This research highlights the value of combining behavioral and physiological approaches in ID research.

npj Science of LearningVol. 11(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Region Västra Götaland (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Stiftelsen Sävstaholm, Bertil Hållstens Forskningsstiftelse, Stockholms Universitet, H.K.H. Kronprinsessan Lovisas Förening för Barnasjukvård
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Williams Syndrome Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.