Are large language models effective for detecting spam messages?

Abstract The widespread global use of short message service (SMS) has heightened the importance of reliable spam detection, as spam messages are not only disruptive but can also facilitate phishing and identity theft. While extensive prior research has explored SMS spam detection using traditional machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and transformer-based encoder models, the recent rapid advances in large language models (LLMs) with strong natural language understanding capabilities motivate a fresh, systematic evaluation. In this study, we investigate how effectively LLMs detect SMS spam using both English and Korean datasets. We benchmark representative prior approaches on recent SMS spam corpora and compare them against LLM-based classifiers. Our experiments cover both commercial black-box LLMs and locally deployable white-box models and examine multiple prompting strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. Furthermore, to reflect adversarial characteristics commonly used to evade detection, we evaluate robustness under concept drift and adversarial attack settings. Experimental results on English and Korean SMS datasets indicate that LLMs are highly robust for spam detection and can provide interpretable rationales by leveraging their language understanding capabilities, suggesting that LLMs are a highly effective and practical option for modern SMS spam filtering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Security
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-026-01283-5
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are large language models effective for detecting spam messages?

Jaeho Hwang, Sooyon Seo, Minseok Hur, Moohong Min
International Journal of Information Security
Spam and Phishing Detection
article

Are large language models effective for detecting spam messages?

Jaeho Hwang, Sooyon Seo, Minseok Hur, Moohong Min
article en

Abstract

Abstract The widespread global use of short message service (SMS) has heightened the importance of reliable spam detection, as spam messages are not only disruptive but can also facilitate phishing and identity theft. While extensive prior research has explored SMS spam detection using traditional machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and transformer-based encoder models, the recent rapid advances in large language models (LLMs) with strong natural language understanding capabilities motivate a fresh, systematic evaluation. In this study, we investigate how effectively LLMs detect SMS spam using both English and Korean datasets. We benchmark representative prior approaches on recent SMS spam corpora and compare them against LLM-based classifiers. Our experiments cover both commercial black-box LLMs and locally deployable white-box models and examine multiple prompting strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. Furthermore, to reflect adversarial characteristics commonly used to evade detection, we evaluate robustness under concept drift and adversarial attack settings. Experimental results on English and Korean SMS datasets indicate that LLMs are highly robust for spam detection and can provide interpretable rationales by leveraging their language understanding capabilities, suggesting that LLMs are a highly effective and practical option for modern SMS spam filtering.

International Journal of Information SecurityVol. 25(4)
Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Spam and Phishing Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.