University Researchers and Researchers With Learning Disabilities Co‐Interviewing as Part of an Inclusive Research Team

ABSTRACT Background Co‐production in research entails researchers, practitioners and the public working together on a project, sharing decision making, responsibility and ownership of a project and its outcomes. This paper reflects on the process of university researchers and researchers with learning disabilities working together on an inclusive research project about supporting people with learning disabilities to make decisions about mental health medication. Method This paper explores the inclusive approach taken to design and conduct interviews. Findings Researchers with learning disabilities brought a unique perspective to the project due to their lived experience, which resulted in benefits for the whole research team as well as research participants. Interview materials were relevant and accessible and there was often common ground, increased trust and a strong rapport with interview participants with learning disabilities. The co‐interviewing approach with health professionals appeared to increase reflection on working practices. Conclusions Co‐interviewing can be a more inclusive, equitable interview approach, leading to more relevant, meaningful and impactful research outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.70066
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University Researchers and Researchers With Learning Disabilities Co‐Interviewing as Part of an Inclusive Research Team

Francesca Ribenfors, Umesh Chauhan, Chris Hatton, Sue Caton et al.
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Disability Rights and Representation
article

University Researchers and Researchers With Learning Disabilities Co‐Interviewing as Part of an Inclusive Research Team

Francesca Ribenfors, Umesh Chauhan, Chris Hatton, Sue Caton, Katherine Runswick‐Cole, D Cavanagh, Matty Prothero, Nathan Rawcliffe, Hutchinson Christine, Mark O'Farrell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Co‐production in research entails researchers, practitioners and the public working together on a project, sharing decision making, responsibility and ownership of a project and its outcomes. This paper reflects on the process of university researchers and researchers with learning disabilities working together on an inclusive research project about supporting people with learning disabilities to make decisions about mental health medication. Method This paper explores the inclusive approach taken to design and conduct interviews. Findings Researchers with learning disabilities brought a unique perspective to the project due to their lived experience, which resulted in benefits for the whole research team as well as research participants. Interview materials were relevant and accessible and there was often common ground, increased trust and a strong rapport with interview participants with learning disabilities. The co‐interviewing approach with health professionals appeared to increase reflection on working practices. Conclusions Co‐interviewing can be a more inclusive, equitable interview approach, leading to more relevant, meaningful and impactful research outcomes.

British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Edge Hill University (GB), University of Lancashire (GB), Sunderland College (GB), For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (US), Oldham Council (GB), University of Sunderland (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.