Prognostic Significance and Primary–Metastatic Differences in VASH1 Expression, CD34-Defined Microvessel Density, and VEGF Expression in Colorectal Cancer

This study evaluated the prognostic significance of vasohibin-1 (VASH1) expression, cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34)-defined microvessel density (MVD), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, as well as the differences in these parameters between primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. Tissue microarrays were used to quantify VASH1 and VEGF expression and CD34-defined MVD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal cut-off values for overall survival (OS). Correlations among markers were analyzed with Spearman’s test, paired tissue comparisons by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and survival outcomes by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. The study included 144 CRC patients (median age: 60 years; 59% male). ROC analysis determined optimal thresholds of 6 for VASH1 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–0.87), 37 for CD34-defined MVD (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.68–0.84), and 6 for VEGF (AUC: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58–0.76). Patients with high VASH1 expression, high CD34-defined MVD, and high VEGF expression had significantly shorter OS compared with their corresponding low-marker groups (VASH1, p < 0.001; CD34-defined MVD, p < 0.001; VEGF, p = 0.007). Among the 45 patients with paired primary and metastatic samples, metastatic lesions showed significantly lower VASH1 and VEGF expression and lower CD34-defined MVD than matched primary tumors, with median values decreasing from 6.0 to 4.0 for VASH1 (p = 0.002), from 4 to 3 for VEGF (p < 0.001), and from 32 to 27 for CD34-defined MVD (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, high VASH1 expression (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.01–4.20, p = 0.048) and high CD34-defined MVD (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.15–3.89, p = 0.015) remained independent predictors of poor OS. High VASH1 expression and high CD34-defined MVD were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS in CRC. Lower angiogenesis-related marker levels in metastatic lesions suggest heterogeneity in tumor angiogenesis. External validation is required before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27146319
Primary Topic
Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Significance and Primary–Metastatic Differences in VASH1 Expression, CD34-Defined Microvessel Density, and VEGF Expression in Colorectal Cancer

Özlem Aydın İsak, Oktay Halit Aktepe, Olcay Kurtulan, Şuayib Yalçın et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
article

Prognostic Significance and Primary–Metastatic Differences in VASH1 Expression, CD34-Defined Microvessel Density, and VEGF Expression in Colorectal Cancer

Özlem Aydın İsak, Oktay Halit Aktepe, Olcay Kurtulan, Şuayib Yalçın, Rezan Berkay İzgör, Tugce Ulasli
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the prognostic significance of vasohibin-1 (VASH1) expression, cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34)-defined microvessel density (MVD), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, as well as the differences in these parameters between primary and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. Tissue microarrays were used to quantify VASH1 and VEGF expression and CD34-defined MVD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal cut-off values for overall survival (OS). Correlations among markers were analyzed with Spearman’s test, paired tissue comparisons by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and survival outcomes by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. The study included 144 CRC patients (median age: 60 years; 59% male). ROC analysis determined optimal thresholds of 6 for VASH1 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–0.87), 37 for CD34-defined MVD (AUC: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.68–0.84), and 6 for VEGF (AUC: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58–0.76). Patients with high VASH1 expression, high CD34-defined MVD, and high VEGF expression had significantly shorter OS compared with their corresponding low-marker groups (VASH1, p < 0.001; CD34-defined MVD, p < 0.001; VEGF, p = 0.007). Among the 45 patients with paired primary and metastatic samples, metastatic lesions showed significantly lower VASH1 and VEGF expression and lower CD34-defined MVD than matched primary tumors, with median values decreasing from 6.0 to 4.0 for VASH1 (p = 0.002), from 4 to 3 for VEGF (p < 0.001), and from 32 to 27 for CD34-defined MVD (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, high VASH1 expression (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.01–4.20, p = 0.048) and high CD34-defined MVD (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.15–3.89, p = 0.015) remained independent predictors of poor OS. High VASH1 expression and high CD34-defined MVD were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS in CRC. Lower angiogenesis-related marker levels in metastatic lesions suggest heterogeneity in tumor angiogenesis. External validation is required before clinical application.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 27(14)
Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Memorial Ankara Hospital (TR), Hacettepe University Hospital (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Hacettepe Üniversitesi
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.