Portrayals of Medical Research in Prime-Time Dramas: A Content Analysis

Background: Television (TV) dramas are a significant source of information about health and medical research for lay audiences, blending accurate depictions with dramatic distortions that can shape beliefs about how research is conducted and governed. This study systematically analyzed selected U.S. television dramas to characterize how medical research is portrayed, including the frequency, context, accuracy, and ethical framing of research-related storylines. Methods: A systematic content analysis was conducted of episodes from prime-time legal and medical dramas aired over the past 20 years. Episodes involving medical research were identified via streaming platforms and Internet Movie Database (IMDb), and then coded using a seven-domain framework (plot, themes, ethical dilemmas, impact on public perceptions, character portrayals, accuracy, and key developments) developed by an emergency medicine expert panel. One investigator re-reviewed a random 10% subsample to assess reliability (kappa), and results were summarized with descriptive statistics and frequency tables. Results: A total of 170 episodes were identified from 7 legal and 20 medical dramas. Grey's Anatomy, House, and Do No Harm yielded the most research-focused episodes. Depictions of research were generally unfavorable (82.9%). Research protocols and informed consent were frequently misrepresented (63.5%), medical errors and cover-ups were exaggerated (28.8%), and consequences for unethical behavior were often minimized (32.9%). The reliability of data collection was substantial (κ = 0.76). Conclusion: In this sample of prime-time legal and medical dramas, medical research was portrayed predominantly in a negative, conflict-laden light, with recurring emphasis on ethical tension, shortcuts, and patient harm. These portrayals may foster mistrust, therapeutic misconception, and unrealistic expectations, highlighting the need for more accurate, ethically grounded depictions of medical research in popular culture.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.112794
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portrayals of Medical Research in Prime-Time Dramas: A Content Analysis

Jeffrey Jones, Chelsea C Lopez, Jenny K Haely, Cecilia C Li et al.
Cureus
Media Influence and Health
article

Portrayals of Medical Research in Prime-Time Dramas: A Content Analysis

Jeffrey Jones, Chelsea C Lopez, Jenny K Haely, Cecilia C Li, Nicholas J Mulder, Michelle A Padley, Olivia C Manke, Mariela C Martinez
article en

Abstract

Background: Television (TV) dramas are a significant source of information about health and medical research for lay audiences, blending accurate depictions with dramatic distortions that can shape beliefs about how research is conducted and governed. This study systematically analyzed selected U.S. television dramas to characterize how medical research is portrayed, including the frequency, context, accuracy, and ethical framing of research-related storylines. Methods: A systematic content analysis was conducted of episodes from prime-time legal and medical dramas aired over the past 20 years. Episodes involving medical research were identified via streaming platforms and Internet Movie Database (IMDb), and then coded using a seven-domain framework (plot, themes, ethical dilemmas, impact on public perceptions, character portrayals, accuracy, and key developments) developed by an emergency medicine expert panel. One investigator re-reviewed a random 10% subsample to assess reliability (kappa), and results were summarized with descriptive statistics and frequency tables. Results: A total of 170 episodes were identified from 7 legal and 20 medical dramas. Grey's Anatomy, House, and Do No Harm yielded the most research-focused episodes. Depictions of research were generally unfavorable (82.9%). Research protocols and informed consent were frequently misrepresented (63.5%), medical errors and cover-ups were exaggerated (28.8%), and consequences for unethical behavior were often minimized (32.9%). The reliability of data collection was substantial (κ = 0.76). Conclusion: In this sample of prime-time legal and medical dramas, medical research was portrayed predominantly in a negative, conflict-laden light, with recurring emphasis on ethical tension, shortcuts, and patient harm. These portrayals may foster mistrust, therapeutic misconception, and unrealistic expectations, highlighting the need for more accurate, ethically grounded depictions of medical research in popular culture.

Cureus
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.