Change and continuity in historical translation policies through institutional models and policy circulation: the case of the League of Nations

This article provides an overview of the language and translation policies of the League of Nations by focusing on the way the latter dealt with translation from or into its official languages, as well as its practices to handle the use of non-official languages. The League’s policy is here put in dialogue with the language and translation policies of previous and subsequent bodies, such as the Paris Peace Conference, through the notion of institutional models. While institutional models circulate, this chapter argues that the contexts in which institutional practices were decided, often do not. The article concludes by discussing the League’s language and translation policy from the perspective of policy circulation, an approach that can offer precious insights into contradictions between policies, practices and beliefs, and offer inspiration for addressing contemporary challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translation Studies
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2026.2688776
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Change and continuity in historical translation policies through institutional models and policy circulation: the case of the League of Nations

Elisabet Carbó-Catalán
Translation Studies
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Change and continuity in historical translation policies through institutional models and policy circulation: the case of the League of Nations

Elisabet Carbó-Catalán
article en

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the language and translation policies of the League of Nations by focusing on the way the latter dealt with translation from or into its official languages, as well as its practices to handle the use of non-official languages. The League’s policy is here put in dialogue with the language and translation policies of previous and subsequent bodies, such as the Paris Peace Conference, through the notion of institutional models. While institutional models circulate, this chapter argues that the contexts in which institutional practices were decided, often do not. The article concludes by discussing the League’s language and translation policy from the perspective of policy circulation, an approach that can offer precious insights into contradictions between policies, practices and beliefs, and offer inspiration for addressing contemporary challenges.

Translation Studies
University of Liège (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.