Citizenship and autonomy: Bilateral labour migration governance and its discontents in Malawi, Mexico, and Spain, 1919–75

Abstract During the 1930s, the International Labour Organization sought to establish standards for bilateral labour migration agreements on separate but parallel colonial and nation-state tracks. I interrogate the ramifications of these discussions across the subsequent half-century, integrating global structural scales of analysis with migrants’ perspectives on the ground. First, I trace the concept of the ‘temporary migrant worker’ in the bilateral migration agreements signed in the 1930s to the 1960s between Spain and France; Nyasaland (later renewed by independent Malawi) and South Africa; and Mexico and United States. I then show how common post-war ideas and pressures led Mexico, Spain, and Nyasaland/Malawi to invest local authorities with substantial control over emigration and deprioritize migrants’ comfort and safety. Migrant-generated sources, notably letters, petitions, and oral histories, point to a resultant convergence of experience unanticipated by international policy discourses: migrants coming to perceive their own states as a primary barrier to progress, dignity, and autonomy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global History
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740022826100527
Primary Topic
African history and culture studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizenship and autonomy: Bilateral labour migration governance and its discontents in Malawi, Mexico, and Spain, 1919–75

Julie M. Weise
Journal of Global History
African history and culture studies
article

Citizenship and autonomy: Bilateral labour migration governance and its discontents in Malawi, Mexico, and Spain, 1919–75

Julie M. Weise
article en

Abstract

Abstract During the 1930s, the International Labour Organization sought to establish standards for bilateral labour migration agreements on separate but parallel colonial and nation-state tracks. I interrogate the ramifications of these discussions across the subsequent half-century, integrating global structural scales of analysis with migrants’ perspectives on the ground. First, I trace the concept of the ‘temporary migrant worker’ in the bilateral migration agreements signed in the 1930s to the 1960s between Spain and France; Nyasaland (later renewed by independent Malawi) and South Africa; and Mexico and United States. I then show how common post-war ideas and pressures led Mexico, Spain, and Nyasaland/Malawi to invest local authorities with substantial control over emigration and deprioritize migrants’ comfort and safety. Migrant-generated sources, notably letters, petitions, and oral histories, point to a resultant convergence of experience unanticipated by international policy discourses: migrants coming to perceive their own states as a primary barrier to progress, dignity, and autonomy.

Journal of Global History
University of Oregon, Gerda Henkel Foundation, Center for the Study of Women, University of California, Los Angeles
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
African history and culture studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Citizenship and autonomy: Bilateral labour migration governance and its discontents in Malawi, Mexico, and Spain, 1919–75 — Julie M. Weise · Journal of Global History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS