Higher education and vulnerable groups: a study of reporting practices of New Zealand universities

Purpose This paper aims to provide a longitudinal examination of New Zealand (NZ) universities’ use of annual reports, sustainability reports, strategy reports and vision statements to disclose information about vulnerable staff and students over the period 2017–2021. Design/methodology/approach This study’s sample included all NZ universities. A total of 62 reports/statements covering the period 2017–2021 were content analysed to see how NZ universities disclose information on their vulnerable staff and students. Findings This study’s findings reveal that NZ universities are selective in their disclosures, choose to prioritise some groups over others and fail to provide clear KPIs, targets, goals and strategies for promoting vulnerable groups’ participation, engagement and achievement. In addition to the general lack of disclosures on vulnerable groups by NZ universities, this study also observed a failure by NZ universities to increase their disclosures across time. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to systematically investigate both historical reports such as annual and sustainability reports and forward-looking strategic disclosures published by NZ universities on vulnerable staff and students. These findings have implications for universities, university staff, university students, student unions, staff unions, government and policymakers for assessing the NZ university sector’s accountability for and performance associated with reporting on vulnerable groups. Policymakers can use the present research to gauge the extent to which organisations are currently recognising their accountability towards individuals belonging to vulnerable groups, as embodied in the publicly available disclosures these organisations make. Such understanding will assist in the formulation of future policymaking, including the potential adoption of regulation. Finally, practitioners can use the present research to benchmark their own annual disclosure practices relating to vulnerable groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-12-2024-0284
Primary Topic
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Higher education and vulnerable groups: a study of reporting practices of New Zealand universities

Mansi Mansi, Rakesh Pandey, Ralph Adler
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
article

Higher education and vulnerable groups: a study of reporting practices of New Zealand universities

Mansi Mansi, Rakesh Pandey, Ralph Adler
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to provide a longitudinal examination of New Zealand (NZ) universities’ use of annual reports, sustainability reports, strategy reports and vision statements to disclose information about vulnerable staff and students over the period 2017–2021. Design/methodology/approach This study’s sample included all NZ universities. A total of 62 reports/statements covering the period 2017–2021 were content analysed to see how NZ universities disclose information on their vulnerable staff and students. Findings This study’s findings reveal that NZ universities are selective in their disclosures, choose to prioritise some groups over others and fail to provide clear KPIs, targets, goals and strategies for promoting vulnerable groups’ participation, engagement and achievement. In addition to the general lack of disclosures on vulnerable groups by NZ universities, this study also observed a failure by NZ universities to increase their disclosures across time. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to systematically investigate both historical reports such as annual and sustainability reports and forward-looking strategic disclosures published by NZ universities on vulnerable staff and students. These findings have implications for universities, university staff, university students, student unions, staff unions, government and policymakers for assessing the NZ university sector’s accountability for and performance associated with reporting on vulnerable groups. Policymakers can use the present research to gauge the extent to which organisations are currently recognising their accountability towards individuals belonging to vulnerable groups, as embodied in the publicly available disclosures these organisations make. Such understanding will assist in the formulation of future policymaking, including the potential adoption of regulation. Finally, practitioners can use the present research to benchmark their own annual disclosure practices relating to vulnerable groups.

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
University of Tasmania (AU), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.