Large language models in model-driven engineering: a systematic mapping study

Abstract The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) has emerged as a rapidly evolving research area. While existing systematic literature reviews have examined specific technical approaches, a comprehensive mapping of the broader research landscape (e.g., development trends) remains lacking. This study presents a systematic mapping study of LLM applications in MDE, analyzing 86 primary studies collected from five databases, covering publications from 2022 to early 2026. Guided by five research questions, we characterize the field across five dimensions: MDE task distribution and research contribution types, LLM technologies and interaction strategies, artifact representation and processing, validation practices, and publication landscape. Our findings reveal that current LLM4MDE research is heavily concentrated on Model Generation, while tasks such as Model Migration, DSL Engineering, and Metamodeling remain marginal. Most approaches rely on black-box OpenAI models accessed via remote APIs and adapted through prompt engineering, with fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation rarely employed. Inputs are predominantly natural-language artifacts, while outputs are model-oriented but usually expressed in lightweight textual formats rather than native MDE exchange formats. Validation is centered on quantitative experimentation, with 42% of studies reporting no baseline and cost efficiency reported in fewer than one quarter of studies. The field has grown rapidly, from one paper in 2022 to 42 in 2025, with research concentrated in Europe and Canada and limited industry involvement. Based on these findings, we identify gaps and opportunities across task coverage, technical configuration, and evaluation practice, offering a knowledge map to guide future work in this cross-disciplinary field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical Software Engineering
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-026-10921-4
Primary Topic
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large language models in model-driven engineering: a systematic mapping study

Daniel Strüber, Markus Stumptner, Regina Hebig, Anne Koziolek et al.
Empirical Software Engineering
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
article

Large language models in model-driven engineering: a systematic mapping study

Daniel Strüber, Markus Stumptner, Regina Hebig, Anne Koziolek, Weixing Zhang, Nathan Hagel, Haowei Cheng, Fu Yuhong, Maximilian Hummel, Bowen Jiang, Jialong Li, Georg Grossmann, Vincenzo Scotti
article en

Abstract

Abstract The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) has emerged as a rapidly evolving research area. While existing systematic literature reviews have examined specific technical approaches, a comprehensive mapping of the broader research landscape (e.g., development trends) remains lacking. This study presents a systematic mapping study of LLM applications in MDE, analyzing 86 primary studies collected from five databases, covering publications from 2022 to early 2026. Guided by five research questions, we characterize the field across five dimensions: MDE task distribution and research contribution types, LLM technologies and interaction strategies, artifact representation and processing, validation practices, and publication landscape. Our findings reveal that current LLM4MDE research is heavily concentrated on Model Generation, while tasks such as Model Migration, DSL Engineering, and Metamodeling remain marginal. Most approaches rely on black-box OpenAI models accessed via remote APIs and adapted through prompt engineering, with fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation rarely employed. Inputs are predominantly natural-language artifacts, while outputs are model-oriented but usually expressed in lightweight textual formats rather than native MDE exchange formats. Validation is centered on quantitative experimentation, with 42% of studies reporting no baseline and cost efficiency reported in fewer than one quarter of studies. The field has grown rapidly, from one paper in 2022 to 42 in 2025, with research concentrated in Europe and Canada and limited industry involvement. Based on these findings, we identify gaps and opportunities across task coverage, technical configuration, and evaluation practice, offering a knowledge map to guide future work in this cross-disciplinary field.

Empirical Software EngineeringVol. 32(1)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Waseda University (JP), University of Rostock (DE), The University of Adelaide (AU), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.