The Impact of Dedicated Local Sales Taxes (D‐LSTs) on General Fund Expenditures: Evidence From Texas

Abstract Do dedicated local sales taxes (D‐LSTs) supplement or supplant general‐purpose spending? The study applies heterogeneity‐robust staggered difference‐in‐differences estimator of Callaway and Sant'Anna (C&S, 2021) and interactive fixed effects (IFE) estimation on a panel of Texas cities. The C&S aggregate average treatment effect on General Fund expenditures is positive. The IFE estimator, which relaxes the parallel trends assumption, confirms that all D‐LST types produce positive effects on the General Fund, with property tax relief and economic development designations generating the largest responses. These patterns support the supplementing hypothesis: voter‐approved earmarks do not reduce operational expenditures as classical fungibility theory predicts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Budgeting &amp Finance
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.70039
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Dedicated Local Sales Taxes (D‐LSTs) on General Fund Expenditures: Evidence From Texas

Edmund Poku Adu, Clancy A. Owoo, Robert Bland
Public Budgeting &amp Finance
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

The Impact of Dedicated Local Sales Taxes (D‐LSTs) on General Fund Expenditures: Evidence From Texas

Edmund Poku Adu, Clancy A. Owoo, Robert Bland
article en

Abstract

Abstract Do dedicated local sales taxes (D‐LSTs) supplement or supplant general‐purpose spending? The study applies heterogeneity‐robust staggered difference‐in‐differences estimator of Callaway and Sant'Anna (C&S, 2021) and interactive fixed effects (IFE) estimation on a panel of Texas cities. The C&S aggregate average treatment effect on General Fund expenditures is positive. The IFE estimator, which relaxes the parallel trends assumption, confirms that all D‐LST types produce positive effects on the General Fund, with property tax relief and economic development designations generating the largest responses. These patterns support the supplementing hypothesis: voter‐approved earmarks do not reduce operational expenditures as classical fungibility theory predicts.

Public Budgeting &amp Finance
University of North Texas (US), Arkansas State University (US), Arkansas Biosciences Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impact of Dedicated Local Sales Taxes (D‐LSTs) on General Fund Expenditures: Evidence From Texas — Edmund Poku Adu, Clancy A. Owoo, et al. · Public Budgeting &amp Finance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS