Excitation-Density-Controlled Regimes of Collective Light–Matter Dynamics

Theoretical descriptions of collective light–matter dynamics often rely on the mean-field (MF) or single-excitation (SE) approximation, yet the parameter regimes where they apply are rarely clearly delineated. Here we show that representative limiting regimes are characterized by two independent parameters: the number of molecules ( N ) and the excitation number ( N exc ). In the Tavis–Cummings model, when N ≫ 1 and the excitation density ( N exc / N ) goes to 0, the MF and SE descriptions agree and yield linear collective dynamics, showing harmonic Rabi oscillations. At finite excitation density ( N exc / N ∼ O ( 1 ) ), the large- N limit remains accurately described by MF dynamics but becomes nonlinear in N exc / N, manifested by a Duffing equation for the cavity amplitude with anharmonic Rabi frequency. We further use cluster expansion to examine finite- N correlations beyond MF. When local vibronic interactions are included, the same linear collective limit is reached by both approximations, with SE reaching it through polaron decoupling and MF through linearization. This two-parameter regime map clarifies the limits in which different theoretical descriptions provide valid descriptions of collective light–matter dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6c01689
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Strong Light-Matter Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Excitation-Density-Controlled Regimes of Collective Light–Matter Dynamics

Wenxiang Ying, Abraham Nitzan
1 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Strong Light-Matter Interactions
6.58
article

Excitation-Density-Controlled Regimes of Collective Light–Matter Dynamics

Wenxiang Ying, Abraham Nitzan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Theoretical descriptions of collective light–matter dynamics often rely on the mean-field (MF) or single-excitation (SE) approximation, yet the parameter regimes where they apply are rarely clearly delineated. Here we show that representative limiting regimes are characterized by two independent parameters: the number of molecules ( N ) and the excitation number ( N exc ). In the Tavis–Cummings model, when N ≫ 1 and the excitation density ( N exc / N ) goes to 0, the MF and SE descriptions agree and yield linear collective dynamics, showing harmonic Rabi oscillations. At finite excitation density ( N exc / N ∼ O ( 1 ) ), the large- N limit remains accurately described by MF dynamics but becomes nonlinear in N exc / N, manifested by a Duffing equation for the cavity amplitude with anharmonic Rabi frequency. We further use cluster expansion to examine finite- N correlations beyond MF. When local vibronic interactions are included, the same linear collective limit is reached by both approximations, with SE reaching it through polaron decoupling and MF through linearization. This two-parameter regime map clarifies the limits in which different theoretical descriptions provide valid descriptions of collective light–matter dynamics.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Tel Aviv University (IL), California University of Pennsylvania (US)
European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Strong Light-Matter Interactions
6.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Excitation-Density-Controlled Regimes of Collective Light–Matter Dynamics — Wenxiang Ying, Abraham Nitzan · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS