Online safety by design: towards user-centric development of safer AI-based systems

In this opinion piece, we present the view that the safety and security of end users should be placed at the heart of the design and development of any AI-based system deployed on an online service to ensure that risks of harm are minimized. We also posit that while well-crafted regulatory frameworks are necessary to ensure user safety, the growing awareness among users of issues related to trust and safety creates an additional incentive for providers of online services to prioritize user well-being. We provide a brief overview of how online safety relates to several widely used systems on online services that utilize or interact with AI, discussing examples of potential risks of harm, which may be enabled or reinforced by these systems, alongside techniques for mitigating these harms. Future challenges and opportunities across these areas are discussed, along with a summary of how user, device and platform diversity can impact users' experiences with AI-based systems on online services. This article is part of the theme issue 'Safe, secure and robust AI for safety-critical systems'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2025.0126
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online safety by design: towards user-centric development of safer AI-based systems

Thomas Baldwin-McDonald, Andreas Gutmann, Amir Fard, Qiqi Su et al.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Online safety by design: towards user-centric development of safer AI-based systems

Thomas Baldwin-McDonald, Andreas Gutmann, Amir Fard, Qiqi Su, David Fletcher
article en

Abstract

In this opinion piece, we present the view that the safety and security of end users should be placed at the heart of the design and development of any AI-based system deployed on an online service to ensure that risks of harm are minimized. We also posit that while well-crafted regulatory frameworks are necessary to ensure user safety, the growing awareness among users of issues related to trust and safety creates an additional incentive for providers of online services to prioritize user well-being. We provide a brief overview of how online safety relates to several widely used systems on online services that utilize or interact with AI, discussing examples of potential risks of harm, which may be enabled or reinforced by these systems, alongside techniques for mitigating these harms. Future challenges and opportunities across these areas are discussed, along with a summary of how user, device and platform diversity can impact users' experiences with AI-based systems on online services. This article is part of the theme issue 'Safe, secure and robust AI for safety-critical systems'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 384(2324)
Ofcom (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Online safety by design: towards user-centric development of safer AI-based systems — Thomas Baldwin-McDonald, Andreas Gutmann, et al. · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS