Objective Metrics for Predicting New Venture Survival

Abstract Venture evaluations determining the allocation of supporting resources in the innovation system are often based on decision-makers’ intuition. These evaluations in general fail to predict venture survival to a satisfactory extent. Thus, this paper contributes to the academic debate around the prediction of early-stage venture survival by providing evidence for the usefulness of objective measures. Its main contribution to entrepreneurship practice is a potential improvement of entrepreneurship support decision-making. We capture ventures’ dynamic capabilities by measuring transaction relations from business plans and compare the predictive power of this objective measure to a subjective, intuitive judgement on venture survival for the respective business plans and start-ups. Analyses based on a sample of 272 early-stage new technology-based firms suggest that the objective measure does not only outperform the best prediction based on the sample mean but also reaches a significantly higher survival prediction accuracy than the subjective, intuition-based evaluations. It is argued that there is potential for further improving the predictive power reached with objective measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-026-03408-6
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objective Metrics for Predicting New Venture Survival

Kevin Reuther, Yngve Dahle, Christina Ungerer, Guido H. Baltes
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Objective Metrics for Predicting New Venture Survival

Kevin Reuther, Yngve Dahle, Christina Ungerer, Guido H. Baltes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Venture evaluations determining the allocation of supporting resources in the innovation system are often based on decision-makers’ intuition. These evaluations in general fail to predict venture survival to a satisfactory extent. Thus, this paper contributes to the academic debate around the prediction of early-stage venture survival by providing evidence for the usefulness of objective measures. Its main contribution to entrepreneurship practice is a potential improvement of entrepreneurship support decision-making. We capture ventures’ dynamic capabilities by measuring transaction relations from business plans and compare the predictive power of this objective measure to a subjective, intuitive judgement on venture survival for the respective business plans and start-ups. Analyses based on a sample of 272 early-stage new technology-based firms suggest that the objective measure does not only outperform the best prediction based on the sample mean but also reaches a significantly higher survival prediction accuracy than the subjective, intuition-based evaluations. It is argued that there is potential for further improving the predictive power reached with objective measures.

Journal of the Knowledge Economy
Webster Vienna Private University (AT), University of Konstanz (DE), Stellenbosch University (ZA), NLA University College (NO), HTWG Hochschule Konstanz - Technik, Wirtschaft und Gestaltung (DE)
Universität Leipzig
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.