Illicit practices within PPP sponsor networks

Developing countries and emerging economies often rely on public-private partnerships (PPPs) to procure infrastructure projects. PPPs in these markets are prone to illicit practices that may emerge through networks of participants in these projects. Law enforcement agencies struggle to recognize signs of illicit practices, especially in PPP sponsor networks. This study explores how illicit practices are associated with the way sponsors form their networks in PPP markets in a way that may be observable to national and international agencies monitoring the transparency of PPP programs. We evaluate PPP sponsor networks in countries with different degrees of reported illicit practices (Peru, Colombia, Brazil, Portugal, and Chile). Using Bipartite Exponential Random Graph Models, we identify recurring patterns in how sponsors form their networks and interpret the results through the lens of transaction cost theory. The findings demonstrate that sponsors collaborate with the same partners across multiple projects and avoid delivering projects outside this group in contexts with reported high levels of corruption. In such contexts, PPP sponsors follow patterns that are consistent with social mechanisms associated with illicit schemes. Finally, we discuss how applying social network analysis methods can aid control agencies in combating corruption and collusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction Management and Economics
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2026.2699104
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Illicit practices within PPP sponsor networks

Petr Matouš, John Salazar
Construction Management and Economics
Public-Private Partnership Projects
article

Illicit practices within PPP sponsor networks

Petr Matouš, John Salazar
article en

Abstract

Developing countries and emerging economies often rely on public-private partnerships (PPPs) to procure infrastructure projects. PPPs in these markets are prone to illicit practices that may emerge through networks of participants in these projects. Law enforcement agencies struggle to recognize signs of illicit practices, especially in PPP sponsor networks. This study explores how illicit practices are associated with the way sponsors form their networks in PPP markets in a way that may be observable to national and international agencies monitoring the transparency of PPP programs. We evaluate PPP sponsor networks in countries with different degrees of reported illicit practices (Peru, Colombia, Brazil, Portugal, and Chile). Using Bipartite Exponential Random Graph Models, we identify recurring patterns in how sponsors form their networks and interpret the results through the lens of transaction cost theory. The findings demonstrate that sponsors collaborate with the same partners across multiple projects and avoid delivering projects outside this group in contexts with reported high levels of corruption. In such contexts, PPP sponsors follow patterns that are consistent with social mechanisms associated with illicit schemes. Finally, we discuss how applying social network analysis methods can aid control agencies in combating corruption and collusion.

Construction Management and Economics
The University of Sydney (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.