Psychoanalysis and banning conversion therapy: a response to Jeremy Clarke on ‘Code Gender’

Psychoanalysis has a conflicted history with regard to its perspective towards sexuality, particularly homosexuality, in the past. This issue is the subject of current debate, with proposals for UK legislation to impose a criminal legal ban on ‘conversion therapy’ for both sexual orientation and gender identity. This paper critiques Clarke’s support for such a ban, which proposes this ban as a necessary development of current psychoanalytic thought and practice. This critique notes the risks of reifying human rights law as a unitary narrative supporting such a ban, requiring strict compliance by the UK; challenges the origins of transgender status as derived from grievance studies, rather than from analytic principles; contests the use of homosexuality as an appropriate ‘skeleton key’ for constructing psychoanalytic responses to gender identity; and opposes the affirmative drive to reverse epistemic injustice towards trans clients, as conflicting with psychoanalysis’ historic imperative to distinguish between fantasy and truth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychodynamic Practice
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2026.2703696
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychoanalysis and banning conversion therapy: a response to Jeremy Clarke on ‘Code Gender’

Jaco van Zyl, Peter Jenkins
Psychodynamic Practice
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Psychoanalysis and banning conversion therapy: a response to Jeremy Clarke on ‘Code Gender’

Jaco van Zyl, Peter Jenkins
article en

Abstract

Psychoanalysis has a conflicted history with regard to its perspective towards sexuality, particularly homosexuality, in the past. This issue is the subject of current debate, with proposals for UK legislation to impose a criminal legal ban on ‘conversion therapy’ for both sexual orientation and gender identity. This paper critiques Clarke’s support for such a ban, which proposes this ban as a necessary development of current psychoanalytic thought and practice. This critique notes the risks of reifying human rights law as a unitary narrative supporting such a ban, requiring strict compliance by the UK; challenges the origins of transgender status as derived from grievance studies, rather than from analytic principles; contests the use of homosexuality as an appropriate ‘skeleton key’ for constructing psychoanalytic responses to gender identity; and opposes the affirmative drive to reverse epistemic injustice towards trans clients, as conflicting with psychoanalysis’ historic imperative to distinguish between fantasy and truth.

Psychodynamic Practice
IS practice (BE), Manchester University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Psychoanalysis and banning conversion therapy: a response to Jeremy Clarke on ‘Code Gender’ — Jaco van Zyl, Peter Jenkins · Psychodynamic Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS