Construction Education Alignment with Industry Skills Demands: A Data-Driven Evaluation Using Sampled Evidence in Australia

The Australian construction industry is currently navigating a productivity challenge in which workforce skills shortages represent a contributing factor. Historically, attempts to quantify this deficit have relied upon subjective surveys or ethically complex data collection methodologies, lacking the objective scale required for policy reform. To bridge this methodological gap and contribute to the literature with a current skills alignment analysis, this research introduces a natural language processing (utilising SBERT)-driven computational approach to explore the alignment between industry demand and educational supply. A sample of 3468 industry job advertisements from 2016 to 2018 and in 2026 were mapped against a weighted national educational supply vector (72.5% Vocational Education and Training, 27.5% Higher Education) using the standardised Australian Skills Classification taxonomy. The analysis indicates that curriculum–industry misalignment is a potential structural contributor to the skills gap in the sampled construction skills gap. Cosine similarity and Spearman’s rank analyses exposed a misalignment of skills priority by academia (ρtop20 = 0.32 and ρglobal = 0.43). While the education sector dedicates nearly 90% of its combined curriculum to specialist tasks skills, these skills showed a misalignment (60%) with rapidly shifting industry demands. Furthermore, while explicit demand for technology tools skills remained stagnant, a misalignment (54%) quantitatively reflects the documented industry concerns regarding digital readiness caused by a lag in digital-skills training. Ultimately, this study contributes a data-driven methodology and a current skills gap analysis that enables educational policymakers to conduct agile, computation-driven curriculum audits. This supports more frequent and evidence-informed curriculum review in response to the evolving Australian construction industry skill demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147297
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction Education Alignment with Industry Skills Demands: A Data-Driven Evaluation Using Sampled Evidence in Australia

Sara Shirowzhan, Faham Tahmasebinia, Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, Anjuhan Saravana
Sustainability
Higher Education and Employability
article

Construction Education Alignment with Industry Skills Demands: A Data-Driven Evaluation Using Sampled Evidence in Australia

Sara Shirowzhan, Faham Tahmasebinia, Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, Anjuhan Saravana
article en

Abstract

The Australian construction industry is currently navigating a productivity challenge in which workforce skills shortages represent a contributing factor. Historically, attempts to quantify this deficit have relied upon subjective surveys or ethically complex data collection methodologies, lacking the objective scale required for policy reform. To bridge this methodological gap and contribute to the literature with a current skills alignment analysis, this research introduces a natural language processing (utilising SBERT)-driven computational approach to explore the alignment between industry demand and educational supply. A sample of 3468 industry job advertisements from 2016 to 2018 and in 2026 were mapped against a weighted national educational supply vector (72.5% Vocational Education and Training, 27.5% Higher Education) using the standardised Australian Skills Classification taxonomy. The analysis indicates that curriculum–industry misalignment is a potential structural contributor to the skills gap in the sampled construction skills gap. Cosine similarity and Spearman’s rank analyses exposed a misalignment of skills priority by academia (ρtop20 = 0.32 and ρglobal = 0.43). While the education sector dedicates nearly 90% of its combined curriculum to specialist tasks skills, these skills showed a misalignment (60%) with rapidly shifting industry demands. Furthermore, while explicit demand for technology tools skills remained stagnant, a misalignment (54%) quantitatively reflects the documented industry concerns regarding digital readiness caused by a lag in digital-skills training. Ultimately, this study contributes a data-driven methodology and a current skills gap analysis that enables educational policymakers to conduct agile, computation-driven curriculum audits. This supports more frequent and evidence-informed curriculum review in response to the evolving Australian construction industry skill demands.

SustainabilityVol. 18(14)
The University of Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Australian Government
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Higher Education and Employability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.