Using supplementation and growth-promoting management strategies for intensification of stocker steer production on rangelands in the southern Great Plains

ABSTRACT Objectives Our objectives were to evaluate the man-agement strategies of supplementation with extruded dried distillers grains cubes (DDG) and use of a growth-promoting implant on performance of growing steers graz-ing native range over 2 yr. Materials and Methods In Exp. 1 we compared (n = 140 steers per year; BW = 239 ± 21 kg) positive con-trol (PC): late-summer supplementation with 1.13 kg of DDG/d (as-fed basis) and stocking at 2.4 ha/steer; and high supplement (HS): DDG at 0.75% (2.1 kg as fed/d) of BW all summer with a 1.6 ha/steer stocking rate. In Exp. 2 we compared (n = 125 steers per year; BW = 225 ± 23 kg) negative control (NC): no supplement and stocking at 2.0 ha/steer; PC: late-summer supplementation with 0.91 kg of DDG as fed per day and stocking at 2.0 ha/ steer; and HS with stocking at 1.4 ha/steer. Before graz-ing, steers were implanted with a trenbolone acetate–es-tradiol (TBA/E) combination in Exp. 1 and progesterone and estradiol (PG/E) implant in Exp. 2. In mid-summer, one-third of steers in each pasture were either not reim-planted or reimplanted with TBA/E or PG/E. Economic returns were estimated using partial budgeting. Data from each experiment were analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) as a split-plot experiment. Results and Discussion Forage biomass and nutri-tive quality did not differ among treatments at any sam-pling date. The HS treatment increased early summer and overall ADG at both locations, but late-season ADG did not differ between PC and HS. The HS treatment pro-duced the greatest BW gain per hectare and system net returns because the greater supplementation rate support-ed both increased stocking rate and greater season-long ADG. Mid-summer reimplanting with TBA/E increased late-summer ADG, but ADG did not differ between PG/E and non-reimplanted steers in either Exp. Implications and Applications Reimplantation with TBA/E and DDG supplementation can intensify stocker cattle production on native range by increasing gain per hectare and net returns, but the long-term ecological im-pacts of these systems require study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Animal Science
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2026-02795
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using supplementation and growth-promoting management strategies for intensification of stocker steer production on rangelands in the southern Great Plains

Laura E. Goodman, S. A. Gunter, Paul Allen Beck, David Lalman et al.
Applied Animal Science
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
article

Using supplementation and growth-promoting management strategies for intensification of stocker steer production on rangelands in the southern Great Plains

Laura E. Goodman, S. A. Gunter, Paul Allen Beck, David Lalman, C. Worthington, Corey A. Moffet, Z. Grigsby, E.A. DeVuyst, M. New
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Our objectives were to evaluate the man-agement strategies of supplementation with extruded dried distillers grains cubes (DDG) and use of a growth-promoting implant on performance of growing steers graz-ing native range over 2 yr. Materials and Methods In Exp. 1 we compared (n = 140 steers per year; BW = 239 ± 21 kg) positive con-trol (PC): late-summer supplementation with 1.13 kg of DDG/d (as-fed basis) and stocking at 2.4 ha/steer; and high supplement (HS): DDG at 0.75% (2.1 kg as fed/d) of BW all summer with a 1.6 ha/steer stocking rate. In Exp. 2 we compared (n = 125 steers per year; BW = 225 ± 23 kg) negative control (NC): no supplement and stocking at 2.0 ha/steer; PC: late-summer supplementation with 0.91 kg of DDG as fed per day and stocking at 2.0 ha/ steer; and HS with stocking at 1.4 ha/steer. Before graz-ing, steers were implanted with a trenbolone acetate–es-tradiol (TBA/E) combination in Exp. 1 and progesterone and estradiol (PG/E) implant in Exp. 2. In mid-summer, one-third of steers in each pasture were either not reim-planted or reimplanted with TBA/E or PG/E. Economic returns were estimated using partial budgeting. Data from each experiment were analyzed using PROC MIXED in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) as a split-plot experiment. Results and Discussion Forage biomass and nutri-tive quality did not differ among treatments at any sam-pling date. The HS treatment increased early summer and overall ADG at both locations, but late-season ADG did not differ between PC and HS. The HS treatment pro-duced the greatest BW gain per hectare and system net returns because the greater supplementation rate support-ed both increased stocking rate and greater season-long ADG. Mid-summer reimplanting with TBA/E increased late-summer ADG, but ADG did not differ between PG/E and non-reimplanted steers in either Exp. Implications and Applications Reimplantation with TBA/E and DDG supplementation can intensify stocker cattle production on native range by increasing gain per hectare and net returns, but the long-term ecological im-pacts of these systems require study.

Applied Animal ScienceVol. 42(4)
Oklahoma State University (US), Virginia Cooperative Extension (US), Grazinglands Research Laboratory (US), KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.