Is it safe to deploy AI in safety-critical systems?

We consider the reality of deploying artificial intelligence (AI) in safety-critical systems, such as autonomous vehicles, medical diagnoses and weather forecasting. Our discussion is grounded in the mathematical nature of AI systems, including how an AI's mathematical properties relate to its benefit and risk profile. Benefits include the ability to learn models from data even when no physical model exists, increased automation and enhanced speed compared with traditional approaches. Risks of AI include its opaque (mis-)understanding of the world, failures on out-of-distribution inputs, its insatiable appetite for data and computation and the ongoing challenge of aligning the AI's objectives with human values. Such risks are potentially manageable with clear-eyed expectations, and our hope in this work is to clarify what can be expected. This article is part of the theme issue 'Safe, secure and robust AI for safety-critical systems'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2025.0123
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is it safe to deploy AI in safety-critical systems?

Tamara G. Kolda
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Is it safe to deploy AI in safety-critical systems?

Tamara G. Kolda
article en

Abstract

We consider the reality of deploying artificial intelligence (AI) in safety-critical systems, such as autonomous vehicles, medical diagnoses and weather forecasting. Our discussion is grounded in the mathematical nature of AI systems, including how an AI's mathematical properties relate to its benefit and risk profile. Benefits include the ability to learn models from data even when no physical model exists, increased automation and enhanced speed compared with traditional approaches. Risks of AI include its opaque (mis-)understanding of the world, failures on out-of-distribution inputs, its insatiable appetite for data and computation and the ongoing challenge of aligning the AI's objectives with human values. Such risks are potentially manageable with clear-eyed expectations, and our hope in this work is to clarify what can be expected. This article is part of the theme issue 'Safe, secure and robust AI for safety-critical systems'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 384(2324)
Art Institute of Portland (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.