Artificial intelligence in deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: a systematic review and technology readiness assessment

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored across deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders, yet whether current systems are approaching deployment remains unclear. To characterise their scope, validation maturity, and translational readiness, we systematically evaluated 239 peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025, assessing AI methods, validation practices, and barriers constraining clinical translation. Research was dominated by Parkinson’s disease and subthalamic nucleus targeting, with limited coverage of other disorders and targets. Most studies reported encouraging internal performance; however, external validation was rare, evaluations remained predominantly retrospective and single-centre, and more than one-quarter involved small-sample, high-dimensional datasets with elevated overfitting risk. Technology readiness assessment revealed that most systems remain at early-to-intermediate translational stages, constrained more by limited validation than by algorithmic inadequacy, compounded by the biological heterogeneity and dynamic complexity inherent to DBS. Nevertheless, emerging external and prospective studies suggest a field moving toward clinical maturity, with promising applications in targeting, programming, outcome prediction, and adaptive therapy delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03015-4
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: a systematic review and technology readiness assessment

Andrea A. Kühn, Jocelyne Bloch, Martin M. Reich, Hariz Mi et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Artificial intelligence in deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: a systematic review and technology readiness assessment

Andrea A. Kühn, Jocelyne Bloch, Martin M. Reich, Hariz Mi, Xavier Vasques, Elena Moro, Laura Cif, Zohra Souei, Muhammad Mushhood Ur Rehman, Ludvic Zrinzo, Patricia Limousin, Alfonso Fasano, Daniel E. Lumsden, Joachim K. Krauss, Harith Akram, Eduardo M. Moraud, Stephan Chabardes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly explored across deep brain stimulation (DBS) for movement disorders, yet whether current systems are approaching deployment remains unclear. To characterise their scope, validation maturity, and translational readiness, we systematically evaluated 239 peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025, assessing AI methods, validation practices, and barriers constraining clinical translation. Research was dominated by Parkinson’s disease and subthalamic nucleus targeting, with limited coverage of other disorders and targets. Most studies reported encouraging internal performance; however, external validation was rare, evaluations remained predominantly retrospective and single-centre, and more than one-quarter involved small-sample, high-dimensional datasets with elevated overfitting risk. Technology readiness assessment revealed that most systems remain at early-to-intermediate translational stages, constrained more by limited validation than by algorithmic inadequacy, compounded by the biological heterogeneity and dynamic complexity inherent to DBS. Nevertheless, emerging external and prospective studies suggest a field moving toward clinical maturity, with promising applications in targeting, programming, outcome prediction, and adaptive therapy delivery.

npj Digital Medicine
Energy Institute (GB), Humanitas University (IT), University of Sfax (TN), Queen Mary University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), University of Würzburg (DE), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Evelina London Children's Healthcare (GB), Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (FR), Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (FR), Military Hospital of Tunis (TN), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), University College London (GB), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Umeå University (SE), University of Lausanne (CH), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.