When X-ray Features Fail to Identify Intrinsic Emitters: Label Noise and Luminosity Overlap in Machine Learning Classification of AGN and Star-forming Galaxies

Abstract Previously, we found that adding an X-ray flux feature to a Random Forest classifier of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and star-forming galaxies (SFGs) coincided with a decrease in classification accuracy from 97.51% to 89.26%, a counterintuitive result given the prevailing theory that X-rays are a reliable AGN diagnostic. We investigate this discrepancy through both astrophysical and machine learning lenses. On the astrophysical side, we show that the X-ray luminosities of AGN and SFGs in the sample substantially overlap across the canonical 1042 erg/s threshold, reflecting the moderate luminosity characteristic of an optically-selected sample and the contribution of high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) to SFG emission. On the machine learning side, we argue that BPT-derived training labels carry instance-dependent label noise concentrated near the BPT demarcation line, where X-ray data would be most useful as a discriminator. We show that objects misclassified in 5-fold cross-validation cluster near the Kewley demarcation curve, with a median distance of 0.123 dex versus 0.743 dex for correctly classified objects (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D = 0.745, p = 1.67 × 10−9). A controlled cross-validation decomposition shows that the previously reported decrease reflects predominantly sample selection: on a fixed sample, adding the X-ray feature leaves class-resolved metrics unchanged, and its permutation importance is consistent with zero across resampled splits. The classifier therefore makes negligible use of a physically informative feature, consistent with training labels coupled to the optical features. We conclude that future classifiers operating on optically-selected samples should employ independent label sources or noise-robust training methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RAS Techniques and Instruments
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzag091
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When X-ray Features Fail to Identify Intrinsic Emitters: Label Noise and Luminosity Overlap in Machine Learning Classification of AGN and Star-forming Galaxies

Jaymin Ding
2 links
RAS Techniques and Instruments
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

When X-ray Features Fail to Identify Intrinsic Emitters: Label Noise and Luminosity Overlap in Machine Learning Classification of AGN and Star-forming Galaxies

Jaymin Ding
article en

Abstract

Abstract Previously, we found that adding an X-ray flux feature to a Random Forest classifier of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and star-forming galaxies (SFGs) coincided with a decrease in classification accuracy from 97.51% to 89.26%, a counterintuitive result given the prevailing theory that X-rays are a reliable AGN diagnostic. We investigate this discrepancy through both astrophysical and machine learning lenses. On the astrophysical side, we show that the X-ray luminosities of AGN and SFGs in the sample substantially overlap across the canonical 1042 erg/s threshold, reflecting the moderate luminosity characteristic of an optically-selected sample and the contribution of high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) to SFG emission. On the machine learning side, we argue that BPT-derived training labels carry instance-dependent label noise concentrated near the BPT demarcation line, where X-ray data would be most useful as a discriminator. We show that objects misclassified in 5-fold cross-validation cluster near the Kewley demarcation curve, with a median distance of 0.123 dex versus 0.743 dex for correctly classified objects (Kolmogorov-Smirnov D = 0.745, p = 1.67 × 10−9). A controlled cross-validation decomposition shows that the previously reported decrease reflects predominantly sample selection: on a fixed sample, adding the X-ray feature leaves class-resolved metrics unchanged, and its permutation importance is consistent with zero across resampled splits. The classifier therefore makes negligible use of a physically informative feature, consistent with training labels coupled to the optical features. We conclude that future classifiers operating on optically-selected samples should employ independent label sources or noise-robust training methods.

RAS Techniques and Instruments
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
When X-ray Features Fail to Identify Intrinsic Emitters: Label Noise and Luminosity Overlap in Machine Learning Classification of AGN and Star-forming Galaxies — Jaymin Ding · RAS Techniques and Instruments (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS