Job Values and Career Choices of STEM PhD Graduates: Evidence from the 2023 Survey of Doctorate Recipients

Contemporary doctoral education is situated within a changing labor market shaped by gender inequity, disciplinary difference, and regional opportunity structure, yet little is known about how students’ job values predict career choices. Guided by the Theory of Work Adjustment and Warr’s Vitamin Model, we examined associations betwenn job values and employment sector choices among 11161 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) PhDs from the 2023 Survey of Doctorate Recipient, with particular attention to gender differences. We found that valuing independence and job security was positively associated with academic employment, whereas the importance placed on salary exhibited a non-linear effect: individuals who rated salary as moderately important were most likely to work in academia, while those at either end of the scale were less likely to do so. Importantly, these patterns differed significantly by gender, reflecting the persistent gender gap in the academic labor market and how women may strategically pursue non-academic roles to overcome structural constraints and inequities prevalent in academic career paths. These findings complicate our understanding of how job values shape career choices and offer recommendations to improve graduate education and STEM workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Higher Education
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2026.2699777
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Job Values and Career Choices of STEM PhD Graduates: Evidence from the 2023 Survey of Doctorate Recipients

Jue Wu, Lechen Li
The Journal of Higher Education
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Job Values and Career Choices of STEM PhD Graduates: Evidence from the 2023 Survey of Doctorate Recipients

Jue Wu, Lechen Li
article en

Abstract

Contemporary doctoral education is situated within a changing labor market shaped by gender inequity, disciplinary difference, and regional opportunity structure, yet little is known about how students’ job values predict career choices. Guided by the Theory of Work Adjustment and Warr’s Vitamin Model, we examined associations betwenn job values and employment sector choices among 11161 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) PhDs from the 2023 Survey of Doctorate Recipient, with particular attention to gender differences. We found that valuing independence and job security was positively associated with academic employment, whereas the importance placed on salary exhibited a non-linear effect: individuals who rated salary as moderately important were most likely to work in academia, while those at either end of the scale were less likely to do so. Importantly, these patterns differed significantly by gender, reflecting the persistent gender gap in the academic labor market and how women may strategically pursue non-academic roles to overcome structural constraints and inequities prevalent in academic career paths. These findings complicate our understanding of how job values shape career choices and offer recommendations to improve graduate education and STEM workforce.

The Journal of Higher Education
University of Florida (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.