Cement compression device for cemented total knee arthroplasty

Aims: Optimal fixation of the tibial component is crucial to prevent aseptic loosening in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This involves cement penetrating the tibia by 3 mm to 4 mm. Cement application is not standardized, and ideal penetration depth is not achieved frequently. Therefore, a cement compression device (CCD) was developed. The CCD is positioned around the tibial component, prevents cement leakage, and compresses cement into the tibia. It is hypothesized that the CCD enhances cement penetration and distribution in TKA. Methods: Patients were randomized into two groups: cement application using the finger-packing technique or the CCD. A CT scan was performed postoperatively to determine the percentage of cemented surface (PCS) per quadrant in the proximal tibia, up to 7 mm from the tibial baseplate. Differentiation between bone, cement, and prosthesis on the CT scans was performed using a previously validated method in MATLAB, based on differences in Hounsfield units. PCS was compared per quadrant for the mean of 3 mm and 4 mm depth slices and for each millimetre up to 7 mm depth. Additionally, operating time was compared. Results: In 16 patients, the finger-packing technique was used and in 16 patients, the CCD. In the anterolateral and posterolateral quadrants, PCS was 54% in the finger-packing group versus 72% in the CCD group (95% CI -28.85 to -8.17; p < 0.001), and 34% versus 46% (95% CI -22.78 to -2.05; p = 0.025), respectively. In the posteromedial quadrant, PCS was 28% versus 39% (95% CI -22.39 to -0.15; p = 0.047). In the anteromedial quadrant, PCS was higher in the CCD group, but the difference was not significant. Operating time was 66 minutes in the finger-packing group, compared with 68 minutes in the CCD group (95% CI -8.0 to 3.4; p = 0.416). Conclusion: The CCD results in improved cement penetration and distribution in TKA at the mean of 3 mm to 4 mm and reaching up to 7 mm depth from the tibial baseplate. Implementing the CCD does not prolong the procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bone & Joint Open
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.77.bjo-2025-0242.r2
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cement compression device for cemented total knee arthroplasty

Hennie Verburg, Anne J. Brouwer, Nina M. C. Mathijssen, Richard H. M. Goossens et al.
Bone & Joint Open
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Cement compression device for cemented total knee arthroplasty

Hennie Verburg, Anne J. Brouwer, Nina M. C. Mathijssen, Richard H. M. Goossens, Brechtje Hesseling
article en

Abstract

Aims: Optimal fixation of the tibial component is crucial to prevent aseptic loosening in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This involves cement penetrating the tibia by 3 mm to 4 mm. Cement application is not standardized, and ideal penetration depth is not achieved frequently. Therefore, a cement compression device (CCD) was developed. The CCD is positioned around the tibial component, prevents cement leakage, and compresses cement into the tibia. It is hypothesized that the CCD enhances cement penetration and distribution in TKA. Methods: Patients were randomized into two groups: cement application using the finger-packing technique or the CCD. A CT scan was performed postoperatively to determine the percentage of cemented surface (PCS) per quadrant in the proximal tibia, up to 7 mm from the tibial baseplate. Differentiation between bone, cement, and prosthesis on the CT scans was performed using a previously validated method in MATLAB, based on differences in Hounsfield units. PCS was compared per quadrant for the mean of 3 mm and 4 mm depth slices and for each millimetre up to 7 mm depth. Additionally, operating time was compared. Results: In 16 patients, the finger-packing technique was used and in 16 patients, the CCD. In the anterolateral and posterolateral quadrants, PCS was 54% in the finger-packing group versus 72% in the CCD group (95% CI -28.85 to -8.17; p < 0.001), and 34% versus 46% (95% CI -22.78 to -2.05; p = 0.025), respectively. In the posteromedial quadrant, PCS was 28% versus 39% (95% CI -22.39 to -0.15; p = 0.047). In the anteromedial quadrant, PCS was higher in the CCD group, but the difference was not significant. Operating time was 66 minutes in the finger-packing group, compared with 68 minutes in the CCD group (95% CI -8.0 to 3.4; p = 0.416). Conclusion: The CCD results in improved cement penetration and distribution in TKA at the mean of 3 mm to 4 mm and reaching up to 7 mm depth from the tibial baseplate. Implementing the CCD does not prolong the procedure.

Bone & Joint OpenVol. 7(7)
Reinier de Graaf Hospital (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.