A Comparative Corpus Study of Epistemic Culture and Discourse in Computer Science, the Humanities, and the Digital Humanities

This article advances understanding of the interdisciplinary components of the digital humanities, and how this hybrid field relates to some of its contributing epistemic traditions. It builds its approach by drawing upon recent empirical work on the values expressed within AI research, extending from that work’s focus on justificatory chains in computer science scholarship to explore these and related discursive strategies in a comparative, computational context across corpora drawn from computer science, traditional and digital humanities. It also looks at how these different disciplines position themselves epistemically, agentially and discursively. In this way, the paper presents a comparative perspective on the values and approaches, in particular, the divergences among these fields, and points toward some of the specific areas needing to be addressed if they are to work more productively together in the development toward more socially and culturally integrated engineering practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrics
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/metrics3030019
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Corpus Study of Epistemic Culture and Discourse in Computer Science, the Humanities, and the Digital Humanities

Jennifer Edmond
Metrics
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

A Comparative Corpus Study of Epistemic Culture and Discourse in Computer Science, the Humanities, and the Digital Humanities

Jennifer Edmond
article en

Abstract

This article advances understanding of the interdisciplinary components of the digital humanities, and how this hybrid field relates to some of its contributing epistemic traditions. It builds its approach by drawing upon recent empirical work on the values expressed within AI research, extending from that work’s focus on justificatory chains in computer science scholarship to explore these and related discursive strategies in a comparative, computational context across corpora drawn from computer science, traditional and digital humanities. It also looks at how these different disciplines position themselves epistemically, agentially and discursively. In this way, the paper presents a comparative perspective on the values and approaches, in particular, the divergences among these fields, and points toward some of the specific areas needing to be addressed if they are to work more productively together in the development toward more socially and culturally integrated engineering practices.

MetricsVol. 3(3)
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Corpus Study of Epistemic Culture and Discourse in Computer Science, the Humanities, and the Digital Humanities — Jennifer Edmond · Metrics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS