You don’t look sick: Invisible disability, moral injury, and organisational betrayal on the retail front-line

This article examines how the gap between invisible impairment and formal recognition shapes employment experiences. We draw on Jordan’s account as a front-line retail worker in Germany living with a chronic kidney condition that significantly affects work capacity but falls below the threshold for disability classification under the German Sozialgesetzbuch IX (SGB IX). Jordan’s testimony reveals a workplace where support depends on individual managers rather than institutional structures, and where the absence of formal classification renders suffering invisible to the systems designed to address it. We argue that the harm described is best understood as moral injury. Drawing on literature on invisible disability and on moral injury, we demonstrate how classification thresholds, combined with unsupportive employer care, produce institutional betrayal that erodes both worker well-being and organisational attachment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work Employment and Society
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170261476001
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You don’t look sick: Invisible disability, moral injury, and organisational betrayal on the retail front-line

Amal Abdellatif, Milena Tekeste, Tasos Hadjisolomou, Jordan
Work Employment and Society
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

You don’t look sick: Invisible disability, moral injury, and organisational betrayal on the retail front-line

Amal Abdellatif, Milena Tekeste, Tasos Hadjisolomou, Jordan
article en

Abstract

This article examines how the gap between invisible impairment and formal recognition shapes employment experiences. We draw on Jordan’s account as a front-line retail worker in Germany living with a chronic kidney condition that significantly affects work capacity but falls below the threshold for disability classification under the German Sozialgesetzbuch IX (SGB IX). Jordan’s testimony reveals a workplace where support depends on individual managers rather than institutional structures, and where the absence of formal classification renders suffering invisible to the systems designed to address it. We argue that the harm described is best understood as moral injury. Drawing on literature on invisible disability and on moral injury, we demonstrate how classification thresholds, combined with unsupportive employer care, produce institutional betrayal that erodes both worker well-being and organisational attachment.

Work Employment and Society
University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Northumbria University (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.