A data-driven solving strategy based on a greedy optimization algorithm for the analysis of nonlinear beam structures

In the last decade, data-driven computational mechanics (DDCM) has emerged as a novel paradigm in computational mechanics, enabling the direct use of constitutive data — such as stress–strain pairs obtained from experiments, without relying on ad-hoc material models and thereby avoiding information loss. In this work, we extend our data-driven solving strategy GO-ADM, which combines a greedy optimization algorithm with the alternating direction method (ADM), to the structural analysis of geometrically exact beams formulated using director-based kinematics. We discuss a data initialization strategy for nonlinear systems based on a conventional finite element analysis of the same structure using a prescribed constitutive model. The resulting discrete stress and strain fields, possibly obtained under multiple loading scenarios, may also be employed as artificial datasets for the subsequent data-driven computations. Furthermore, we investigate the thermomechanical consistency of both the dataset and the discrete solution, and propose a weak enforcement of this consistency in the latter via a penalty approach. Numerical examples involving single- and multi-member structures demonstrate that the proposed penalty term leads to thermomechanically consistent discrete stress and strain fields. Moreover, for the studied examples, the solving strategy GO-ADM yields a generally improved approximation of the globally optimal solution compared to the standard ADM-based direct solver.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering Science
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2026.104694
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A data-driven solving strategy based on a greedy optimization algorithm for the analysis of nonlinear beam structures

Bruno A. Roccia, Thi-Hoa Nguyen, Cristian Guillermo Gebhardt
International Journal of Engineering Science
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

A data-driven solving strategy based on a greedy optimization algorithm for the analysis of nonlinear beam structures

Bruno A. Roccia, Thi-Hoa Nguyen, Cristian Guillermo Gebhardt
article en

Abstract

In the last decade, data-driven computational mechanics (DDCM) has emerged as a novel paradigm in computational mechanics, enabling the direct use of constitutive data — such as stress–strain pairs obtained from experiments, without relying on ad-hoc material models and thereby avoiding information loss. In this work, we extend our data-driven solving strategy GO-ADM, which combines a greedy optimization algorithm with the alternating direction method (ADM), to the structural analysis of geometrically exact beams formulated using director-based kinematics. We discuss a data initialization strategy for nonlinear systems based on a conventional finite element analysis of the same structure using a prescribed constitutive model. The resulting discrete stress and strain fields, possibly obtained under multiple loading scenarios, may also be employed as artificial datasets for the subsequent data-driven computations. Furthermore, we investigate the thermomechanical consistency of both the dataset and the discrete solution, and propose a weak enforcement of this consistency in the latter via a penalty approach. Numerical examples involving single- and multi-member structures demonstrate that the proposed penalty term leads to thermomechanically consistent discrete stress and strain fields. Moreover, for the studied examples, the solving strategy GO-ADM yields a generally improved approximation of the globally optimal solution compared to the standard ADM-based direct solver.

International Journal of Engineering ScienceVol. 230
University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.