A data-driven solving strategy based on a greedy optimization algorithm for the analysis of nonlinear beam structures
In the last decade, data-driven computational mechanics (DDCM) has emerged as a novel paradigm in computational mechanics, enabling the direct use of constitutive data — such as stress–strain pairs obtained from experiments, without relying on ad-hoc material models and thereby avoiding information loss. In this work, we extend our data-driven solving strategy GO-ADM, which combines a greedy optimization algorithm with the alternating direction method (ADM), to the structural analysis of geometrically exact beams formulated using director-based kinematics. We discuss a data initialization strategy for nonlinear systems based on a conventional finite element analysis of the same structure using a prescribed constitutive model. The resulting discrete stress and strain fields, possibly obtained under multiple loading scenarios, may also be employed as artificial datasets for the subsequent data-driven computations. Furthermore, we investigate the thermomechanical consistency of both the dataset and the discrete solution, and propose a weak enforcement of this consistency in the latter via a penalty approach. Numerical examples involving single- and multi-member structures demonstrate that the proposed penalty term leads to thermomechanically consistent discrete stress and strain fields. Moreover, for the studied examples, the solving strategy GO-ADM yields a generally improved approximation of the globally optimal solution compared to the standard ADM-based direct solver.
Authors
- Bruno A. Roccia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-2739)
- Thi-Hoa Nguyen
- Cristian Guillermo Gebhardt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0942-5526)
Institutions
- University of Bergen (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Engineering Science
- Published
- 2026-10-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2026.104694
- Primary Topic
- Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00