Assessing Emergency Clinicians' Needs From Trauma Clinical Guidance: A Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, emergency clinicians are often the first to care for injured patients in the hospital setting. Current trauma clinical guidance does not consistently meet the needs of emergency clinicians caring for this population. OBJECTIVES: To better understand end-user needs, we evaluated emergency clinician priorities and preferences in accessing, interpreting, and applying trauma clinical guidance. METHODS: Emergency clinicians were recruited via email for semi-structured video conference interviews. Rapid directed qualitative analysis of interview notes and audio recordings yielded initial insights about guidance barriers and facilitators. A subsequent quantitative survey was developed and distributed via email to members of relevant professional associations. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Twelve emergency clinicians participated in interviews. A total of 154 eligible participants responded to the survey. Clinicians expressed support for trauma clinical guidance overall but often find resources lacking. Barriers to guidance usage include lack of awareness, difficulty locating guidance, and cumbersome design. Clinical guidance should be objective, concise, updated, and easy-to-use at bedside. The strongest determinant of guidance usability was being quickly understood in a time-pressured situation. Clinicians prefer to access guidance through mobile applications or multi-modal channels. Rural clinicians reported additional difficulties in staffing and having resources needed to follow guidance. CONCLUSION: When developing trauma clinical guidance, the trauma community should continue to consider the variety of end users and clinical settings, including emergency clinicians. Mobile device-friendly and quickly understandable formats may be important considerations for authors of trauma clinical guidance, although further work with larger and more diverse population is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2026.07.016
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Emergency Clinicians' Needs From Trauma Clinical Guidance: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Jeffrey M. Goodloe, Gabriela Zavala Wong, Andrea L. Nevedal, James E. Winslow et al.
PubMed
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Assessing Emergency Clinicians' Needs From Trauma Clinical Guidance: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Jeffrey M. Goodloe, Gabriela Zavala Wong, Andrea L. Nevedal, James E. Winslow, Christopher Kang, A. O. Johnson, Lindsay Fountain, Kayla Corredera-Wells, Thomas McNally, Jenny M Guido, Nicholas Cozzi, Lacey N LaGrone
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, emergency clinicians are often the first to care for injured patients in the hospital setting. Current trauma clinical guidance does not consistently meet the needs of emergency clinicians caring for this population. OBJECTIVES: To better understand end-user needs, we evaluated emergency clinician priorities and preferences in accessing, interpreting, and applying trauma clinical guidance. METHODS: Emergency clinicians were recruited via email for semi-structured video conference interviews. Rapid directed qualitative analysis of interview notes and audio recordings yielded initial insights about guidance barriers and facilitators. A subsequent quantitative survey was developed and distributed via email to members of relevant professional associations. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Twelve emergency clinicians participated in interviews. A total of 154 eligible participants responded to the survey. Clinicians expressed support for trauma clinical guidance overall but often find resources lacking. Barriers to guidance usage include lack of awareness, difficulty locating guidance, and cumbersome design. Clinical guidance should be objective, concise, updated, and easy-to-use at bedside. The strongest determinant of guidance usability was being quickly understood in a time-pressured situation. Clinicians prefer to access guidance through mobile applications or multi-modal channels. Rural clinicians reported additional difficulties in staffing and having resources needed to follow guidance. CONCLUSION: When developing trauma clinical guidance, the trauma community should continue to consider the variety of end users and clinical settings, including emergency clinicians. Mobile device-friendly and quickly understandable formats may be important considerations for authors of trauma clinical guidance, although further work with larger and more diverse population is needed.

PubMedVol. 88
Rush University Medical Center (US), Madigan Army Medical Center (US), Duke University (US), University of South Dakota (US), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE), University of Colorado Health (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services (US), Wake Forest University (US), University of Oklahoma (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.