Beyond the critical moment: Relocating critical management studies inside management

Critical management studies (CMS) is going through an identity crisis. Although it is one of the most prominent additions to management thinking in the last 35 years, many now see CMS as a dead-end for cynical, distanced, and meaningless work. But what should replace it? There is no shortage of opinions. However, informed by narrative theory and critical management history, this paper contends that these proposals are unlikely to succeed unless we tell new stories about where CMS, and potentially other critical projects, came from. There is a widely recited idea that CMS developed when a group of sociologists migrated into UK business schools in the wake of Thatcherism. It presents CMS through a narrative of outsiders, struggling with their place inside management research—an account which has been used to question the legitimacy of critical approaches in management ever since. This paper shows that this account overlooks a long-standing engagement with critical theory within management scholarship itself. Telling this intellectual origin story could help critical scholars and critically-oriented practitioners to think in new ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084261490285
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the critical moment: Relocating critical management studies inside management

Robert Cluley
Organization
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Beyond the critical moment: Relocating critical management studies inside management

Robert Cluley
article en

Abstract

Critical management studies (CMS) is going through an identity crisis. Although it is one of the most prominent additions to management thinking in the last 35 years, many now see CMS as a dead-end for cynical, distanced, and meaningless work. But what should replace it? There is no shortage of opinions. However, informed by narrative theory and critical management history, this paper contends that these proposals are unlikely to succeed unless we tell new stories about where CMS, and potentially other critical projects, came from. There is a widely recited idea that CMS developed when a group of sociologists migrated into UK business schools in the wake of Thatcherism. It presents CMS through a narrative of outsiders, struggling with their place inside management research—an account which has been used to question the legitimacy of critical approaches in management ever since. This paper shows that this account overlooks a long-standing engagement with critical theory within management scholarship itself. Telling this intellectual origin story could help critical scholars and critically-oriented practitioners to think in new ways.

Organization
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon