Global infrastructures of trust: Cryptography and the emergence of non-sovereign authority structures in cyberspace

Public Key Infrastructures (PKIs) are transnational institutions organised around a collectively recognized trust hierarchy. A product of the commercialization and de-militarization of digital cryptography, they play a critical role in protecting the security and integrity of online communications. This paper investigates the formation of PKIs from the 1990s to the present, showing how they diverged from the hierarchical structure of nation-state sovereignty. Despite early efforts by states to bring encryption technology into conformity with existing governmental power hierarchies, private actors supplanted state actors in the formation of PKIs. Understanding this divergence contributes to our understanding of how digitisation has altered the global political economy and illuminates current debates over 'digital sovereignty'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telecommunications Policy
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2026.103344
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Global infrastructures of trust: Cryptography and the emergence of non-sovereign authority structures in cyberspace

Milton Mueller
1 links
Telecommunications Policy
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Global infrastructures of trust: Cryptography and the emergence of non-sovereign authority structures in cyberspace

Milton Mueller
article en

Abstract

Public Key Infrastructures (PKIs) are transnational institutions organised around a collectively recognized trust hierarchy. A product of the commercialization and de-militarization of digital cryptography, they play a critical role in protecting the security and integrity of online communications. This paper investigates the formation of PKIs from the 1990s to the present, showing how they diverged from the hierarchical structure of nation-state sovereignty. Despite early efforts by states to bring encryption technology into conformity with existing governmental power hierarchies, private actors supplanted state actors in the formation of PKIs. Understanding this divergence contributes to our understanding of how digitisation has altered the global political economy and illuminates current debates over 'digital sovereignty'.

Telecommunications PolicyVol. 51(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Global infrastructures of trust: Cryptography and the emergence of non-sovereign authority structures in cyberspace — Milton Mueller · Telecommunications Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS