Community structure of the pseudofractal web

Abstract The Ramsey community number $ r_{\kappa} $ is the smallest network size at which a graph is better described by a partition into communities than by no partition, under a prescribed detection rule and at certainty $ q $. On a scale-free graph this question is confounded: a block model can split a network on its degree distribution alone, separating hubs from leaves that are no community at all. I compute $ r_{\kappa} $ analytically for the deterministic pseudofractal scale-free web of Dorogovtsev, Goltsev, and Mendes, separating genuine community structure from degree heterogeneity with two closed-form detection rules. Under a plain Bernoulli stochastic block model, the web’s natural recursive bipartition is unpreferred while small and breaks at $ \boldsymbol{r_{\kappa} = 1095} $ nodes, with a log-evidence growing as $ \boldsymbol{(\ln 3-\tfrac{2}{3}\ln 2)n} $. Under a degree-corrected model tested against the configuration-model null, the same partition survives, breaking far earlier at $ \boldsymbol{r_{\kappa} = 123} $, with a log-evidence growing as $ \boldsymbol{(2\ln 3-\tfrac{4}{3}\ln 2)n} $—exactly twice the plain slope, and independent of the prior. Both figures are quoted at the default certainty $ \boldsymbol{q = 0.99} $; the transitions are sharp and the web exists only at discrete sizes, so of the values tabulated only $ \boldsymbol{q=\tfrac{1}{2}} $ changes an answer, lowering the degree-corrected one to 42. Degree correction reverses the ordering of the candidate cuts, demoting the hub–leaf split and elevating the recursive one. Because the web is self-similar, the best description is not two communities but a nested hierarchy: the degree-corrected evidence keeps rising as the partition is refined, and is maximized at of order $ \sqrt{n} $ communities of $ \boldsymbol{\sim\sqrt{n}} $ nodes. A purely local recursive rule thus builds true hierarchical community structure, over and above the scale-free degree sequence it also produces, in an exactly solvable setting. The appendices give every derivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Complex Networks
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnag040
Primary Topic
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community structure of the pseudofractal web

Alexei Vazquez
Journal of Complex Networks
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
article

Community structure of the pseudofractal web

Alexei Vazquez
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Ramsey community number $ r_{\kappa} $ is the smallest network size at which a graph is better described by a partition into communities than by no partition, under a prescribed detection rule and at certainty $ q $. On a scale-free graph this question is confounded: a block model can split a network on its degree distribution alone, separating hubs from leaves that are no community at all. I compute $ r_{\kappa} $ analytically for the deterministic pseudofractal scale-free web of Dorogovtsev, Goltsev, and Mendes, separating genuine community structure from degree heterogeneity with two closed-form detection rules. Under a plain Bernoulli stochastic block model, the web’s natural recursive bipartition is unpreferred while small and breaks at $ \boldsymbol{r_{\kappa} = 1095} $ nodes, with a log-evidence growing as $ \boldsymbol{(\ln 3-\tfrac{2}{3}\ln 2)n} $. Under a degree-corrected model tested against the configuration-model null, the same partition survives, breaking far earlier at $ \boldsymbol{r_{\kappa} = 123} $, with a log-evidence growing as $ \boldsymbol{(2\ln 3-\tfrac{4}{3}\ln 2)n} $—exactly twice the plain slope, and independent of the prior. Both figures are quoted at the default certainty $ \boldsymbol{q = 0.99} $; the transitions are sharp and the web exists only at discrete sizes, so of the values tabulated only $ \boldsymbol{q=\tfrac{1}{2}} $ changes an answer, lowering the degree-corrected one to 42. Degree correction reverses the ordering of the candidate cuts, demoting the hub–leaf split and elevating the recursive one. Because the web is self-similar, the best description is not two communities but a nested hierarchy: the degree-corrected evidence keeps rising as the partition is refined, and is maximized at of order $ \sqrt{n} $ communities of $ \boldsymbol{\sim\sqrt{n}} $ nodes. A purely local recursive rule thus builds true hierarchical community structure, over and above the scale-free degree sequence it also produces, in an exactly solvable setting. The appendices give every derivation.

Journal of Complex NetworksVol. 14(6)
Nodes & Links (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Community structure of the pseudofractal web — Alexei Vazquez · Journal of Complex Networks (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS