The Maxillofacial Academic Practice (MAP) study phase 1: oral and maxillofacial surgical trainee research engagement.

The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) funded Maxillofacial Academic Practice (MAP) study aims to define the current state of research and academic training within UK Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS). Phase One of the study, the OMFS Trainee Research Engagement Survey, explores levels of research involvement, barriers, and facilitators among trainees. An online cross-sectional survey was developed comprising multiple-choice, free-text, and 10-point Likert scale items. It was distributed to OMFS trainees across the UK. The primary outcome was the level of research interest and current engagement, while secondary outcomes included identifying barriers, facilitators, and proposed interventions to be explored in Phase Two. A total of 82 OMFS trainees responded, representing all UK training regions and levels. Of these, 30/82 were specialist trainees and 45/82 were pre-ST3 trainees. A total of 58/82 expressed clear research interest, and 46/82 were actively involved in projects. However, only 19/82 reported working in departments with OMFS-led research, and 51/82 were unaware of local research contacts. Research interest was significantly higher among trainees in research-affiliated units. Despite the high level of interest, 25/82 reported having no opportunity to participate. Mean self-rated exposure to research was 5/10. OMFS trainees demonstrate strong academic interest, yet access to research opportunities remains limited. Trainees with greater exposure are more likely to pursue academic careers. Targeted recommendations include clearer national guidance, improved access to mentorship, and the development of cross-Deanery academic networks to support future OMFS clinical academics - as will be explored in Phase 2 of the MAP study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2026.06.003
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Maxillofacial Academic Practice (MAP) study phase 1: oral and maxillofacial surgical trainee research engagement.

Clare Schilling, Ross O. C. Elledge, Kathleen F. M. Fan, Richard Shaw et al.
PubMed
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

The Maxillofacial Academic Practice (MAP) study phase 1: oral and maxillofacial surgical trainee research engagement.

Clare Schilling, Ross O. C. Elledge, Kathleen F. M. Fan, Richard Shaw, Andrew Schache, John Breeze, Karl Payne, Peter A Brennan, Jie Luo
article en

Abstract

The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) funded Maxillofacial Academic Practice (MAP) study aims to define the current state of research and academic training within UK Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS). Phase One of the study, the OMFS Trainee Research Engagement Survey, explores levels of research involvement, barriers, and facilitators among trainees. An online cross-sectional survey was developed comprising multiple-choice, free-text, and 10-point Likert scale items. It was distributed to OMFS trainees across the UK. The primary outcome was the level of research interest and current engagement, while secondary outcomes included identifying barriers, facilitators, and proposed interventions to be explored in Phase Two. A total of 82 OMFS trainees responded, representing all UK training regions and levels. Of these, 30/82 were specialist trainees and 45/82 were pre-ST3 trainees. A total of 58/82 expressed clear research interest, and 46/82 were actively involved in projects. However, only 19/82 reported working in departments with OMFS-led research, and 51/82 were unaware of local research contacts. Research interest was significantly higher among trainees in research-affiliated units. Despite the high level of interest, 25/82 reported having no opportunity to participate. Mean self-rated exposure to research was 5/10. OMFS trainees demonstrate strong academic interest, yet access to research opportunities remains limited. Trainees with greater exposure are more likely to pursue academic careers. Targeted recommendations include clearer national guidance, improved access to mentorship, and the development of cross-Deanery academic networks to support future OMFS clinical academics - as will be explored in Phase 2 of the MAP study.

PubMedVol. 64(8)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), King's College London (GB), Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB), Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), King's College Hospital (GB), British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (GB), Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Centre for Defence Medicine (GB), University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.