Improving the subtyping of gamblers by gambling type

In gambling research, gambling subtypes have traditionally been used to distinguish between games of skill or competition and games of chance. The former are referred to as strategic games, whereas the latter are classified as non-strategic games. Despite their similarities, individuals who engage in strategic and non-strategic gambling exhibit distinct characteristics. Consequently, a substantial body of research has examined how gamblers differ according to the types of gambling activities in which they engage. These differences in gamblers' profiles have important implications for the clinical assessment and treatment of individuals with gambling problems. Nevertheless, heterogeneous classification methods have been used to define gambling subtypes, compromising the comparability and reproducibility of research findings and hindering the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for the regulation, prevention, and treatment of gambling disorder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2026.00414
Primary Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the subtyping of gamblers by gambling type

Céline Bonnaire, Céline Bonnaire
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
article

Improving the subtyping of gamblers by gambling type

Céline Bonnaire, Céline Bonnaire
article en

Abstract

In gambling research, gambling subtypes have traditionally been used to distinguish between games of skill or competition and games of chance. The former are referred to as strategic games, whereas the latter are classified as non-strategic games. Despite their similarities, individuals who engage in strategic and non-strategic gambling exhibit distinct characteristics. Consequently, a substantial body of research has examined how gamblers differ according to the types of gambling activities in which they engage. These differences in gamblers' profiles have important implications for the clinical assessment and treatment of individuals with gambling problems. Nevertheless, heterogeneous classification methods have been used to define gambling subtypes, compromising the comparability and reproducibility of research findings and hindering the implementation of evidence-based recommendations for the regulation, prevention, and treatment of gambling disorder.

Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Université Paris Cité (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé (FR), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Improving the subtyping of gamblers by gambling type — Céline Bonnaire, Céline Bonnaire · Journal of Behavioral Addictions (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS