Mirror Observerhood Lab VI: Neuro-Symbolic Persistence in Language-Like Agents

This release forms part of the Computational Observerhood Labs of Mirror Programme, Volume I: Observerhood. Lab VI extends the Mirror Observerhood Labs from simple non-linguistic agents to language-like neuro-symbolic agents. The experiment does not evaluate a production language model. Instead, it simulates a stochastic semantic front-end that emits candidate propositions about goals, roles, memory, tools and self-state, then compares four architectures across 38,400 deterministic episodes. The central question is whether a persistent symbolic layer with reliability-weighted commit gates and diagnostic repair can protect action-relevant self-state and tool commitments under semantic corruption. Four agents are compared: a stateless semantic agent, a memory-only agent, a persistent self-model agent and a Mirror neuro-symbolic agent with channel reliabilities, symbolic commit gates and diagnostic repair. The result is deliberately mixed. The Mirror neuro-symbolic agent improves task success under several perturbations, especially false self-state, tool unreliability, memory injection, mixed stress and high repair cost. Net viability, however, improves only under tool unreliability and mixed stress. In other conditions, diagnostic repair and gating costs outweigh the avoided semantic error. The central finding is conservative: a language-like agent should not treat fluent semantic output as durable state by default. Candidate propositions should pass through reliability-weighted symbolic commitment, contradiction checks and cost-sensitive repair. But this architecture is not automatically beneficial. It becomes viability-positive only where semantic corruption threatens action and where repair cost is justified by avoided loss. The release includes a standalone paper and a reproducibility package containing the Python implementation, fixed-seed outputs, raw per-episode results, summary data, Mirror viability advantage data, success advantage data, figures, requirements, citation metadata and licences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21170478
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
96.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mirror Observerhood Lab VI: Neuro-Symbolic Persistence in Language-Like Agents

Lloyd Christopher Smith
18 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
96.32
article

Mirror Observerhood Lab VI: Neuro-Symbolic Persistence in Language-Like Agents

Lloyd Christopher Smith
article en
18 citations

Abstract

This release forms part of the Computational Observerhood Labs of Mirror Programme, Volume I: Observerhood. Lab VI extends the Mirror Observerhood Labs from simple non-linguistic agents to language-like neuro-symbolic agents. The experiment does not evaluate a production language model. Instead, it simulates a stochastic semantic front-end that emits candidate propositions about goals, roles, memory, tools and self-state, then compares four architectures across 38,400 deterministic episodes. The central question is whether a persistent symbolic layer with reliability-weighted commit gates and diagnostic repair can protect action-relevant self-state and tool commitments under semantic corruption. Four agents are compared: a stateless semantic agent, a memory-only agent, a persistent self-model agent and a Mirror neuro-symbolic agent with channel reliabilities, symbolic commit gates and diagnostic repair. The result is deliberately mixed. The Mirror neuro-symbolic agent improves task success under several perturbations, especially false self-state, tool unreliability, memory injection, mixed stress and high repair cost. Net viability, however, improves only under tool unreliability and mixed stress. In other conditions, diagnostic repair and gating costs outweigh the avoided semantic error. The central finding is conservative: a language-like agent should not treat fluent semantic output as durable state by default. Candidate propositions should pass through reliability-weighted symbolic commitment, contradiction checks and cost-sensitive repair. But this architecture is not automatically beneficial. It becomes viability-positive only where semantic corruption threatens action and where repair cost is justified by avoided loss. The release includes a standalone paper and a reproducibility package containing the Python implementation, fixed-seed outputs, raw per-episode results, summary data, Mirror viability advantage data, success advantage data, figures, requirements, citation metadata and licences.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
96.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.