Expert perceptions of the relative importance of ecological impacts of biological invasions

Invasive species pose a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Although it is widely recognized that invasion impacts differ across habitats and taxonomic groups, a systematic evaluation of their perceived ecological importance has remained unexplored. We surveyed over 400 international experts in invasion science to systematically assess the importance of the 19 different types of ecological impacts across habitats, taxa, and levels of biological organization. We found consistent patterns in expert perceptions, where changes in assemblage structure, population size, and species loss were rated as most important, while others, like soundscape, fire regime, and microclimate, consistently received lower scores. Scores between taxa varied more than scores between habitats, while responses were more consistent among respondents with greater experience in the field. Our results highlight the impact types that would require greater management efforts (i.e., the higher scores), as well as those that could benefit from further research (i.e., the lower scores).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0351775
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert perceptions of the relative importance of ecological impacts of biological invasions

Laís Carneiro, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Caetano, Jane A. Catford, Franck Courchamp et al.
PLoS ONE
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Expert perceptions of the relative importance of ecological impacts of biological invasions

Laís Carneiro, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Caetano, Jane A. Catford, Franck Courchamp, Shengyu Wang, Ugo Arbieu
article en

Abstract

Invasive species pose a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Although it is widely recognized that invasion impacts differ across habitats and taxonomic groups, a systematic evaluation of their perceived ecological importance has remained unexplored. We surveyed over 400 international experts in invasion science to systematically assess the importance of the 19 different types of ecological impacts across habitats, taxa, and levels of biological organization. We found consistent patterns in expert perceptions, where changes in assemblage structure, population size, and species loss were rated as most important, while others, like soundscape, fire regime, and microclimate, consistently received lower scores. Scores between taxa varied more than scores between habitats, while responses were more consistent among respondents with greater experience in the field. Our results highlight the impact types that would require greater management efforts (i.e., the higher scores), as well as those that could benefit from further research (i.e., the lower scores).

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
Australian National University (AU), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), King's College London (GB), AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Ecologie, Société, Evolution (FR)
AXA Research Fund
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.