Residents’ preferences regarding shared mobility in car-free zones: the case of delft’s inner city

Growing car dependence intensifies congestion and reduces urban liveability. In response, many cities are introducing car-free zones supported by shared mobility to promote sustainable and accessible transport. However, residents’ preferences for shared modes in actively transitioning car-free contexts remain underexplored. This study examines these preferences in the inner city of Delft, a medium-sized Dutch city transforming toward a car-free area under the “Mobility Plan 2040.” A stated choice experiment examines how travel cost, walking time, socio-demographic characteristics, and trip purposes influence the adoption of four shared electric modes, (e-) bikes, scooters, cargo bikes, and cars, while an “opt-out” option captured avoidance behaviour. A Mixed Logit model estimated the Value of Time and quantified preference heterogeneity. Travel cost and walking time are the most significant determinants. The estimated VoT (€0.20 per minute) highlights the importance of reducing access distances. Socio-demographic variation was significant: younger, digitally literate residents prefer micromobility, while those aged 50 + are more likely to opt out. Gender, income, education, and trip purpose further shape preferences, with commuting trips showing lower adoption due to time and reliability constraints. Rather than forecasting demand, we use the experiment as a behavioural diagnostic of an urban transition in progress: the 64% of choices selecting the opt-out indicate that the offered shared modes were frequently not acceptable substitutes for the recalled trip—most strongly when that trip was car-based—highlighting that car-free strategies must combine service design (pricing, fleet proximity) with car-ownership targeted measures for the groups least ready to substitute.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.102120
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residents’ preferences regarding shared mobility in car-free zones: the case of delft’s inner city

Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Yashar Araghi, Niels van Oort, Fatemeh Torabi Kachousangi et al.
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Residents’ preferences regarding shared mobility in car-free zones: the case of delft’s inner city

Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Yashar Araghi, Niels van Oort, Fatemeh Torabi Kachousangi, Serge Hoogendoorn
article en

Abstract

Growing car dependence intensifies congestion and reduces urban liveability. In response, many cities are introducing car-free zones supported by shared mobility to promote sustainable and accessible transport. However, residents’ preferences for shared modes in actively transitioning car-free contexts remain underexplored. This study examines these preferences in the inner city of Delft, a medium-sized Dutch city transforming toward a car-free area under the “Mobility Plan 2040.” A stated choice experiment examines how travel cost, walking time, socio-demographic characteristics, and trip purposes influence the adoption of four shared electric modes, (e-) bikes, scooters, cargo bikes, and cars, while an “opt-out” option captured avoidance behaviour. A Mixed Logit model estimated the Value of Time and quantified preference heterogeneity. Travel cost and walking time are the most significant determinants. The estimated VoT (€0.20 per minute) highlights the importance of reducing access distances. Socio-demographic variation was significant: younger, digitally literate residents prefer micromobility, while those aged 50 + are more likely to opt out. Gender, income, education, and trip purpose further shape preferences, with commuting trips showing lower adoption due to time and reliability constraints. Rather than forecasting demand, we use the experiment as a behavioural diagnostic of an urban transition in progress: the 64% of choices selecting the opt-out indicate that the offered shared modes were frequently not acceptable substitutes for the recalled trip—most strongly when that trip was car-based—highlighting that car-free strategies must combine service design (pricing, fleet proximity) with car-ownership targeted measures for the groups least ready to substitute.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 38
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.