Barriers to adoption of respiratory function monitors in neonatal resuscitation

Establishing effective ventilation is the cornerstone of successful neonatal resuscitation. Respiratory function monitors (RFMs) are devices used during delivery room (DR) resuscitation to provide real-time measurements of airway pressure, gas flow, tidal volume and mask leak during positive pressure ventilation. These data may help clinicians assess ventilation effectiveness and optimise respiratory support during the critical transition after birth. Despite observational data indicating that RFMs can provide ventilatory feedback during neonatal resuscitation, they have not been widely adopted in routine practice.1 This is often attributed to limited high-quality evidence and lack of guideline endorsement. However, adoption is likely hindered by multiple interacting factors (table 1). In addition to limitations in the evidence base, barriers related to usability, training and medical device development from conception to clinical implementation must also be considered. The challenges surrounding RFMs may reflect wider difficulties in translating promising neonatal technologies from research settings into routine clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2026-004896
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to adoption of respiratory function monitors in neonatal resuscitation

Neaha Patel, Burak Salgin
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
article

Barriers to adoption of respiratory function monitors in neonatal resuscitation

Neaha Patel, Burak Salgin
article en

Abstract

Establishing effective ventilation is the cornerstone of successful neonatal resuscitation. Respiratory function monitors (RFMs) are devices used during delivery room (DR) resuscitation to provide real-time measurements of airway pressure, gas flow, tidal volume and mask leak during positive pressure ventilation. These data may help clinicians assess ventilation effectiveness and optimise respiratory support during the critical transition after birth. Despite observational data indicating that RFMs can provide ventilatory feedback during neonatal resuscitation, they have not been widely adopted in routine practice.1 This is often attributed to limited high-quality evidence and lack of guideline endorsement. However, adoption is likely hindered by multiple interacting factors (table 1). In addition to limitations in the evidence base, barriers related to usability, training and medical device development from conception to clinical implementation must also be considered. The challenges surrounding RFMs may reflect wider difficulties in translating promising neonatal technologies from research settings into routine clinical care.

BMJ Paediatrics OpenVol. 10(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), William Harvey Research Institute (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.